Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800636
Original file (ND0800636.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-BM3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080111
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN ; Fraudulent entry into naval service

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20010308 - 20010416              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20010417      Period of enlistment : Years Extension          Date of Discharge: 20040315
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 29 D ys      Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 78
Highest Rank /Rate : BM3    Evaluation marks: Performance: 3.5 ( 3 )     Behavior: 2.3 ( 3 )         OTA: 2.78
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJPs :    
         20030314 : Art(s) 92 (Failure to Obey a Regulation) , 113 ( Misbehavior of a Sentinel) . Awarded - Susp

S CMs :   

SPCMs:  

C C :      

Retention Warnings: .

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. None stated .

Decision

Date: 20 08 0501             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE .
Discussion

 : Notwithstanding the annotation on DD Form 293 requesting an upgrade to an Honorable Discharge , the Applicant failed to state any issues or provide the NDRB with any specific area s of concern .

The NDRB reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity , relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. During Board reviews the government is presumed to conduct its affairs with regularity unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.

The Applicant provided no supporting documentation or statements on his behalf . A review of the Applicant’s Service record indicate d he provided false information on his Security Clearance Application ( SF 86 ) during his induction phase into the Navy on 7 March 2001. During the routine security investigation evidence contradicting information provided by the Applicant was uncovered, i.e., credit bureau reports and police reports. I t was determined the Applicant falsely provided information concerning his true financial history and status, felony offenses and other offenses that were resident on his police record. U pon receipt of this information the command began procedures to administ rative ly separat e the Applicant for Fraudulent Enlistment. The Applicant was counseled and notified of his rights. There is no evidence in the Applicant’s record, nor was any provided, demonstrating the command acted outside established DoD or Naval policies in managing this case. Based on this information the Board concluded a n upgrade or change in the characterization of service was not warranted.

The Applicant should note Fraudulent Enlistment into military service is a violation of the Uniform Code Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 83 and is punishable as a court-martial may direct. The command chose not to pursue UCMJ charges and opted for an administrative separation as the best course of action for the member and the Naval Service.

A fter a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that


















Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until
2 May 2005, Article 1910-134, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 and 113 .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400876

    Original file (ND1400876.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20071117 - 20080819Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080820Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130920Highest Rank/Rate: BM3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 01 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 46EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.5(7)Behavior:2.7(7)OTA: 3.36Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201336

    Original file (ND1201336.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Reliefgranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge.However, based on the unique circumstances surround this case following his discharge, the awarded characterization shall change to GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)and the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001213

    Original file (ND1001213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800337

    Original file (ND0800337.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20000921 - 20001022 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20001023Period of enlistment:4 YearsDate of Discharge:20030930Length of Service: Yrs Mths08 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:24AFQT: 35Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.0 (2) Behavior: 3.0 (2)OTA: 3.17 (2)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Pistol ,,,,, and Periods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500171

    Original file (ND1500171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: HONORABLE Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20051025 - 20051121 COG Active: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20051122 Age at Enlistment: 18 Period of Enlistment: 4 Years NO Extension Date of Discharge: 20061201 Highest Rank/Rate: PSSR Length of Service: 01 Year(s) 00 Month(s) 10 Day(s) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 40 Evaluation Marks: Performance: 2...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800124

    Original file (ND0800124.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the Applicant had no documented misconduct, and served on active duty greater than 180 days, the Board determined an upgrade in the characterization of discharge to honorable was warranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800654

    Original file (ND0800654.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300362

    Original file (ND1300362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with section 1553 (d)(2), the service secretary expedited a final decision and accorded the case sufficient priority to achieve an expedited resolution.The Applicant’s service record documents service as a Block Guard at Camp Deltain Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM.The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401517

    Original file (ND1401517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800457

    Original file (ND0800457.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: MEDICAL CONDITION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19860116 - 19861027Active: 19861028 – 19900830 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19900831Period of enlistment:4 Years+ 2 month extensionDate of Discharge:19931021Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths21 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 78Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Evaluation marks:Performance: 3.4 (6) Behavior:3.4 (6)OTA:...