Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800604
Original file (ND0800604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ADAN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080226
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620150

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19870430 - 198 7 0826              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19 950531      Period of enlistment : Years Extension          Date of Discharge: 19970610
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 16 D ys      Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 41
Highest Rank /Rate : AD3    Evaluation marks: Performance: 3.8 ( 5 )     Behavior: 4.0 ( 5 )          OTA: 3.92
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): , , , , ,

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJPs :    
        
S CMs :   
        
SPCMs:  
        
C C :      
        
Retention Warnings: .
        

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       Record of Service
2.       Isolated Incident

Decision

Date: 20 08 041 0             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE .
Discussion
Issues 1 and 2 (Equity ) : The Applicant was discharged at the end o f his enlistment contract in accordance with reference (a). Reference (a) states that the characterization of the discharge shall be honorable if during current enlistment the member has been awarded in performance evaluations a final individual trait average of 2.0 or greater. A general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service is defined as, “significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct of performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service”. A general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service is normally not awarded at EAOS (expiration of active obligated service) to members with a final trait average of 2.00 or higher. The Applicant’s final trait average was 3.92 . Therefore, the Board found an impropriety in this case based upon the Applicant’s over all trait average at his EAOS .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 15, effective 3 Oct ober 19 96 until 11 Dec ember 19 97,
Article 3620150, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF EXPIRATION OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801108

    Original file (ND0801108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500579

    Original file (ND0500579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00579 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050216. PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 920624 Date of Discharge: 950809 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 04 04 (Does not exclude lost time) Inactive: 00 11 13 PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101452

    Original file (ND1101452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the Board’s review of the Applicant’s record of service and discharge process, the NDRB identified an inequity in the Applicant’s characterization of service and determined that the Applicant warrants an upgrade on the basis of the Enlisted Performance Evaluation System. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601030

    Original file (ND0601030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation NONE. The Board found that in the Applicant’s case, the characterization of service should have been the “type warranted by service record. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR),...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901145

    Original file (ND0901145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Although not raised by the Applicant, the Board reviewed the Applicant’s awarded characterization of discharge following his completed obligated service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002343

    Original file (ND1002343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19981211 - 19990119Active:19990120 - 2003062920030630 - 20070119USNR20070120 - 20070223 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070224Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment:Date of Discharge:20100129Highest Rank/Rate:ABE2Length of Service: Inactive: Years Months6 Days Active 08 Years 00 Months 0 DaysEducation Level:AFQT:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500587

    Original file (ND0500587.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00587 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050223. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. It will take years to prove to people the true me, I believe that if was on the other end of this problem, I would have trouble trusting the other person too, but I do believe in second chances and if a person could prove to me that their past is just that and not want to repeat their...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001768

    Original file (ND1001768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030116 - 20030924Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030925Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090924Highest Rank/Rate:EM3Length of Service: Years Months00 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 99EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.8(9)Behavior:1.9(9)OTA: 3.35Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): (2)Periods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801398

    Original file (ND0801398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the discharge was proper but not equitable. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800652

    Original file (ND0800652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/ REVIEWED Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...