Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801941
Original file (MD0801941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080923
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19990817 - 20000807     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20000808     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20030515      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 8 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 91
MOS: 0481
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:
- 20011219 : Article 91 ( Disrespect toward a noncommissioned officer with obscenities )
 Article 92 ( Failure to obey regulation, by having a tongue ring )
 Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20021120 : For personality disorder and inability to perform required duties .
- 20030429: For being diagnosed with Axis II borderline personality disorder .

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
DD 214:      Service / Medical Record: Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:         From Representat ion :   From Congress member :

Other Documentation :


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6203.3 CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-m artial for violation of the UCM: Article 91 and Article 92 .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Education benefits.
2. Applicant believes he was medically discharged.

Decision


 Date: 20 0 9 0129            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding .
: ( ) . The Applicant contends he received a medical discharge and therefore he should have received an “Honorable” discharge. Additionally, he indicates he “talked to the VA” and they informed him for a medical discharge he should have received an “Honorable” discharge. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by two retention warnings and one NJP for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 91 (Disrespect toward a superior noncommissioned officer); and Article 92 (Disobeying a lawful order). These are considered serious offenses which could have resulted in a punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court martial. The record of evidence also shows the Applicant received at least sixteen adverse written counseling’s between December 2001and March 2003 concerning misconduct or substandard performance of military duties. The command did not refer the Applicant for a court - martial but opted instead f or an administrative discharge.

The record of evidence clearly refutes the Applicant ’s belief he was discharged for medical reason s . He was diagnosed with a personality disorder which rendered him unqualified for continued service and subsequently processed for separation in accordance with applicable regulations. However, because of his NJP the Applicant was not awarded an “Honorable” discharge characterization. The Applicant was notified he was being recommended for a “ General (Under Honorable Condition s” characterization of service with the narrative reason reflecting a personality disorder. The record shows the Applicant acknowledged receipt of this notification on 31 March 2003. A “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” is appropriate if the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance outweighs positive aspects of the member’s military record. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s documented misconduct and sub-standard performance justify this characterization. An upgrade to the characterization of service or a change to the reason for discharge would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial fo r misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801777

    Original file (ND0801777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved; an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801651

    Original file (MD0801651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    - 20021218: For Personality Disorder - 20030116: For Personality Disorder Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: - Record of Trial from 20 May 2003 ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900298

    Original file (ND0900298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20001118 - 20001204Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20001205Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20010831Highest Rank/Rate: ARLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)27 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 73EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:3.0(1)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700475

    Original file (MD0700475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Failure to correct deficiencies may result or further violations of the UCMJ may result in judicial proceedings or administrative separation. 20060120 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (20050120) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): CG 3 rd MAW (20050328) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201272

    Original file (MD1201272.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” During the Applicant’s three years of service, he received three retention counseling warnings and was found guilty of violating several UCMJ articles at an NJP and a summary court-martial. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200012

    Original file (ND1200012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700476

    Original file (MD0700476.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. 20050711: Applicant not recommended for promotion to Corporal due to lack of leadership.Applicant counseled for diagnosed personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801408

    Original file (ND0801408.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. However, the NDRB advises the Applicant to include the VA diagnosis as evidence in petitioning the Board of Corrections for Naval Records for an RE code change, or in requesting a waiver to reenter the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801827

    Original file (MD0801827.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization as determined by the Commanding General was appropriate and an upgrade founded on the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate. Although the Applicant does not explicitly state this in his Application, the NDRB conducted a review based on this presumption. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801792

    Original file (MD0801792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related...