Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801763
Original file (MD0801763.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080804
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to: UNCHARACTERIZED

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19980624 - 19990120                Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19990121      Period of E nlistment : Years Months     Date of Discharge: 20020211
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 21 D a ys       Education Level:        Age at Enlistment:
AFQT: 46          MOS: 3531         Highest Rank:    Fitness R eports:
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions):       ( ) / ( )
 Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle

Periods of CONF : 19990816-19991018 (64 DAYS)

NJP :
- 20011017 : Art icle 86 (U A), 6 and ½ hours
Article 92 (Dis obey a direct order ) , 3 specifications
Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM : SPCM:

CC:
- 19991019 : Offense: Crime against nature and assault on a female.
Sentence : Fined $2,106.00, supervised probation for 24 months.

6105 Counseling :
- 20000111 : For civil conviction on 19991019. I was in hands of civilian authorities from 1630, 19990816 to 1500,
19991019 in the State of North Carolina, Onslow County, Jacksonville, NC. Arrest and conviction was
for crime s against nature committed on 19990801. My trial was held on 19991019 and I was awarded
5 months minimum and 8 months maximum confinement in the custody of NC DOC; fined a total of
$2,106.00. I was awarded 65 days time served in confinement and released under supervised probation
for 24 months.

- 20011016: For revocation of Base driving privileges aboard all Marine Corps Installations, family housing areas,
approach roads to these bases or areas and all installation gates p er BO P5560.2K. The revocation
 expires on 20020927.

types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
        
Related to Post-Service Period (cont) :   

Family/Personal Status:        Community Service:     References:
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:

Other Documentation (Describe) :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 and Article 92.


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Isolated incident.
2. Unjust treatment by command.
3. Desires Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ U ncharacterized ” .

Decision


 Date: 20 08 1204             Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

 : ( ) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant stated his discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in almost three years of ser v ic e. He is asking for an upgrade from an “ Under Other Than Ho norable Conditions ” to a “ General (U nder Honorable Conditions) ” discharge . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by two retention warnings, one NJP for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 (UA), Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order), and a civil felon conviction in the state of North Carolina for crimes against nature. Violations of the UCMJ Article s are considered serious offenses punishable by a bad conduct or d ishonorable discharge and up to imprisonment if adjudicated as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial. The Applicant plead guilty to the charge of crimes against nature and was confined to the Onslow County Jail as punishment.

For the edification of the Applicant, d espite a service member’s prior record of se rvice certain serious offenses, even though isolate d, warrant separation from the n aval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. C haracterization of service as “ General (Under Honorable C onditions) ” is warranted when a member’s service has been honest and faithful , but a significant negative aspect of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record . An “ Under Other Than H onorable C onditions ” discharge is warranted when the basis for separation is commission or omission of an act which constitutes a significant departure from the conduct expected of a service member. T he Applicant’s conduct displayed a significant departure from that expected of a U. S. Marine and the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate; an upgrade would be inappropriate .

: ( ) . The Applicant claims he was treated unjustly by his command because he was used as an example. A r eview of available records reveal ed nothing to indicate the Applicant’s discharge was inconsistent with the standards of disc ipline in the United States Marine Corps nor does t he Applicant provide any documentation or statements from witness to support his claim he was unfairly singled out by his commanding officer. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case . In the absence of collaborating evidence, the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.

 Issue 3: (Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant is requesting his Narrative Reason for Separation be changed from “ M isconduct ” to “ U ncharacterized ” . The Narrative Reason for Separation found in Block 25 of the DD 214 is a plain English reason for separation. The Board is authorized to change this to “Secretarial Authority” if evidence is presented by the Applicant which proves the reason stated was erroneous. The Applicant does not address why he feels the Narrative Reason should change. Neither does he present documentation or statements of witness which would justify the


requested change. In the absence of collaborating evidence, the Board determined the narrative reason was appropriate and a change would be inappropriate.

 A fter a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial fo r misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000049

    Original file (MD1000049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant's case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency.The Applicant’s record of service included for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence, 48 days, apprehended,1 specification).Based on the Applicant’s conviction and sentence at special court-martial, the Applicant was confined and separated with a Bad Conduct characterization of service.The Applicant provided no documentation to support a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801193

    Original file (ND0801193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found his “Uncharacterized ” discharge appropriate and an upgrade to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” would be inappropriate.The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an “Uncharacterized ” separation is considered the equivalent of an “Honorable ” or “General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” discharge.After a thorough review of the available...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000087

    Original file (MD1000087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19990816 - 19990919Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19990920Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19991217Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)28 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:61MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801282

    Original file (ND0801282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ‘Uncharacterized’ separation is considered the equivalent of an ‘Honorable’ or ‘General (Under Honorable Conditions)’ discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801239

    Original file (ND0801239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the Applicant believes these were the reasons he did not perform well and conduct himself in the manner expected, there is no evidence in the Applicant’s record which documents youth, immaturity, or homesickness as a reason for his discharge. The Applicant should also be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801079

    Original file (MD0801079.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900264

    Original file (ND0900264.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT – SERIOUS OFFENSE.Discussion : This petition is somewhat ambiguous as it is not clear what the Applicant is seeking in her request for a “ reset of my military record ” . ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901837

    Original file (ND0901837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200339

    Original file (MD1200339.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The administrative board determined that misconduct was supported by a preponderance of the evidence and recommended separation Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101276

    Original file (MD1101276.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...