Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801242
Original file (MD0801242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20050506
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20020122 - 20020609              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20020610              Period of Enlistment : Years Months             Date of Discharge: 20030128
Length of Service: Yrs Mths 18 D ys     Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 62
MOS: 9900        Highest Rank:                     Fitness Reports:
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): 4.3/2.2 (NFIR)
 Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle: SS, Pistol: , NDSM.
Periods of UA/CONF: UA: 91 days, 20020708-20021006;
CONF: 24 days, 20021119-20021212.

 SCMs:    1
         20021118: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence),
Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order)
         Sentence - Confinement (29 days), FOP ($737 for 1 month).
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representation:              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Reenlistment opportunities.

Decision

 Date: 2008 0711             Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall Misconduct .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning s, regarding .

The Applicant has requested a change in characterization of service to “Uncharacterized.” The Applicant should be made aware an “Uncharacterized” separation is only appropriate during the first 180 days of continuous active service where processing under a more serious basis is not warranted. While in service, the Applicant’s record was marred by violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 and Article 92. Both of these are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge and imprisonment may be awarded if adjudged at a Special or General Court Martial.

The Applicant was found guilty at a Summary Court Martial and awarded an “Under Other than Honorable Conditions” discharge for violations of the UCMJ Article 86 and Article 92. Furthermore, the Applicant was notified on 13 December 2002 he was being administratively processed for discharge; this exceeded the 180 day criterion for an “Uncharacterized” discharge (the Applicant’s service began on 10 June 2002). The 180 day criterion notwithstanding, the violations of the UCMJ could by themselves negate an “Uncharacterized” discharge considering how serious the infractions are to the good order and discipline of the Marine Corps. The Board determined an upgrade was not warranted.

 After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 01 September 2001 until Present).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Articles 86 (Unauthorized absence) and 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order).


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801828

    Original file (MD0801828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401030

    Original file (ND1401030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to improve employment opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900912

    Original file (ND0900912.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701241

    Original file (ND0701241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400061

    Original file (ND1400061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist into the Armed Forces.2. Before separation could be effected, the record indicates the Applicant committed additional misconduct that resulted in his commanding officer renotifying the Applicant on 7 February 2013 of administrative discharge processing for Misconduct (Serious Offense). ” Additional Reviews : After a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001962

    Original file (MD1001962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Non-decisional Issues: The Applicant seeks an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge in order to enhance employment opportunities. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that clemency...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900768

    Original file (MD0900768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19981024 - 19990726Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990727Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20001011Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)18 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:46MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801035

    Original file (ND0801035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post service conduct based on passage of time since discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant. However, the only evidence submitted in the application was a statement, by the Applicant himself, concerning his employment. The Board determined based on the lack of documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate and the characterization of service received, “Uncharacterized”, was an appropriate characterization considering the limited time served and the UCMJ violation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901823

    Original file (MD0901823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB advises the Applicant that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, higher education funding, etc., an Uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900624

    Original file (ND0900624.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the Applicant’s case does not meet this high criterion for an upgrade to his characterization of service to “Honorable ” .After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or...