Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801167
Original file (MD0801167.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-Recruit, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080506
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20060315 - 20060328              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20060329               Period of Enlistment : Years Months             Date of Discharge: 20060428
Length of Service: Yrs Mths 00 D ys     Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 85
MOS: 9900        Highest Rank: Recruit                      Fitness Reports:
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):      None
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle: , Pistol: .
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representation:              From Member of Congress:

Other Documentation (Describe)
         Personal information presented in a resume format.
         Certificate of eligibility for employment as a corrections officer dated 21 SEP 2007.
         Letter from Senator S. M. C. of Maine dated 5 May 2008.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Employment opportunities.
2. Information was disclosed to recruiter.
3. Post service conduct.
Decision

 Date: 20080711            Location: Washington D.C.        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall Fraudulent Entry.
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraph concerning regarding .

: ( ) . The Applicant was discharged by reason of fraudulent entry into military service. Members may be separated for effecting a fraudulent enlistment by falsely representing or deliberately concealing any disqualification factors they may have. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant contends he told both his recruiters and his doctor at Parris Island he used Paxil CR for sleep problems and he has never suffered from depression or any other mental illness.

A review of the records indicates the Applicant’s DD Form 2807-1, Report of Medical History, dated 15 March 2006 reflects he checked “No” to questions 17 (a-i) which deal with nervous troubles, anxiety, depression, counseling, sleep disorders, and the like. The Board also noted the Applicant signed a Moral Disclosure Statement of Understanding on 14 March 2006 in which he was warned that "any pre-existing medical condition must also be listed on your pre-service screen form."
The Department Head of the Mental Health Unit at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island notes on his Psychological Evaluation dated 14 April 2006 the Applicant

"claims to have been treated for panic attacks a few years ago with counseling and medication for about one year. This was confirmed with a parent. As this was not waived at MEPS and is a disqualifying condition, and because of his problems and his lack of motivation to train it is recommended he be separated for Fraud."
Furthermore, during the discharge process, the Applicant provided a Voluntary Medical Statement on 17 April 2006, in which he notes he was treated for an anxiety disorder when he was approximately 18 years old; he also provides the name of a doctor who treated him. On this same statement the Applicant alleges he provided this information to the recruiter, but was cautioned not to disclose it. There is no evidence in the Applicant’s service record which supports this claim or indicates he was told such information. The Board determined a change in the discharge would be inappropriate.

 : ( ) . The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides a change based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. The Applicant provided a personal statement, a resume, and a certificate of eligibility for employment as a corrections officer as evidence of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable employment record, documentation to confirm his educational pursuits, documentation of community service, evidence of a drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee a change to his discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a

case-by-case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by his non-disclosure of pre-service treatment for anxiety disorder. Again, the Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate.
After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court-martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601161

    Original file (MD0601161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: PROPER Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLEIssues 1-2: The Board determined that these Issues are not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. NONE Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700629

    Original file (MD0700629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20071120Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002038

    Original file (MD1002038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701060

    Original file (MD0701060.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation: Administrative separate due to fraudulent enlistment. 19970627 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (UNDATED) SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT (0) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19970711 Types of Documents Submitted by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901108

    Original file (ND0901108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. The Applicant has requested a change in her narrative reason to Entry level separation and contends she did not fraudulently enlist in the military and that she has never been diagnosed, treated, or referred for any mental illness. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902072

    Original file (MD0902072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200601

    Original file (ND1200601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800089

    Original file (MD0800089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20020712 - 20030706 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030707Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 20030718Length of Service: 00 Yrs 00Mths11 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 59MOS: 9900 Highest Rank: PVT Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF: NJPs:6105...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00352

    Original file (MD01-00352.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I feel that I should be able to obtain this because of the fact that I am an ideal citizen and that the Corps has no proof (none exists) of a fraudulent entry. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states the Marine Corps has no proof to support that the applicant had a prior service history of mental breakdowns. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400011

    Original file (MD1400011.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.