Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800381
Original file (MD0800381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20071228
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN (misconduct, drug abuse)

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030920 - 2003 1 1 09                           
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20031 110               Period of enlistment : Years Months             Date of Discharge: 20060420
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 04 Mths   17 D ys          Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 19     AFQT: 33
MOS: 3531        Highest Rank: LCPL                        
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.7 / 3.3
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SSDR, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, Rifle MM

Periods of UA / CONF : 0 / 24

NJPs :     1
         20060307 : Art 112a (Drug Abuse)            Awarded – FOP, RESTR, EPD        Susp -
        
S CMs :    1
         20051103 : Art(s) 99 ( Misbehavior before the enemy) , 112 (Drunk on duty)
         Sentence - , ,

6105 Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Clemency relief.
2 . Record of service.
 3 . PTSD was a casual factor in misconduct.

Decision


 Date: 20 08 0502   Location: Washington D.C       R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

The Naval Discharge Review Board offers its sincere condolences to the family of PFC Cafici for the loss of their son. It was with the greatest respect of PFC Cafici’s service to our country the Board considered PFC Cafici’s , and what ultimately has become the family’s request , to review all a vailable documentation and events leading up to his discharge and weigh those events against the standards of Naval discipline applied throughout our great Service. The Board was mindful of PFC Cafici’s contribution to both the Marine Corps and our Country and it was in this light the members reflected on all the circumstances surrounding this tragic case.

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the family have petitioned. The family is directed to the Addendum page which provides further guidance regarding , specifically the paragraph concerning medical conditions and misconduct.

Issue 2 (Equity). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of a discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if a discharge is inconsistent with discipline standards of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.

There is credible evidence in the record to document PFC Cafici used illegal drugs prior to deploying to Iraq . This evidence is PFC Cafici ’s own voluntary written statement submitted on 3 March 2006 stating he smoked marijuana while on active duty prior to a deployment to Iraq. There is also evidence of post deployment drug use as documented during a command urinalysis which identified PFC Cafici has having used steroids. PFC Cafici further admitted both taking steroids in pill form and obtaining additional liquid steroids requiring injection but failed to obtain syringes before being caught during the urinalysis. The record indicates PFC Cafici’s motivation for obtaining and taking the steroids was to bulk up and make up for the training time he had lost in anticipation of return ing to Iraq. The record indicates the lost training time was the result of being confined to quarters as part of his sentence received from a Summa ry Court Martial for misconduct while in Iraq. T he evidence of record d id not demonstrate PFC Cafici was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. In fact, the Board felt that both his statements and actions proved otherwise.

When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service , was marred by one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 112a (Drug Use) and one Summary Court Martial guilty finding for violation s of the UCMJ A rticle (s) 99 (Misbehavior before the enemy) and Article 112 (Drunk on duty) . Based on these charges and a review of the disciplinary process used by the command a change o r upgrade in the characterization of discharge by the NDRB would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). Again, t here is credi ble evidence in the record PFC Cafici used illegal drugs more than once . This misconduct occurred before and after his deployment to Iraq. PFC Cafici does not deny but freely admitted all of his misconduct . The NDRB concluded that the military medical evidence of record does not support a PTSD claim but references adjustment disorder ; e ven the Veterans Affairs doctors were at first reluctant to diagnose PTSD. Regardless, PFC Cafici’s drug use and misconduct, by his own statement, occurred before first deploying to Iraq and the steroid use, although post deployment was used to try and get fit quickly for possible redeployment . T he NDRB did not consider the un diagnosed PTSD as a mitigating factor associated with his misconduct and therefore the Board concluded he was still responsible for his actions . The Board acknowledges PFC Cafici’s duty in Iraq was stressful and upsetting however, his actions upon returning from Iraq and after his summary court martial still did not support PTSD as a factor for his misconduct.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable and in keeping with the standards of discipline within the Naval service. We regret the evidence of record could not support a more favorable outcome for this particular case.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (s) 99, 112, 112a .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101984

    Original file (MD1101984.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of controlled substances - wrongful use of steroids)Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: SCM:NONE SPCM:CC: Retention Warning Counseling:NONE Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900076

    Original file (MD0900076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the factors enumerated above, the NDRB determined the Applicant was never diagnosed with service related PTSD by military medical personnel who had complete access to his complete medical record and accurate service history; his anxiety existed prior to entering the service and he was never found to be not responsible for his actions. Therefore, the Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201700

    Original file (MD1201700.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s command found him guilty of violating UCMJ Article 112a, an offense that requires mandatory separation processing per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101868

    Original file (MD1101868.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined that relief based on this issue is not warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and the discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801848

    Original file (MD0801848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant claims he should have received a medical discharge for an attempted suicide vice for a pattern of misconduct because he was suffering fromPTSD due to injuries received from an Improvised Explosive Device(IED) blast in Iraq.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board determined the awarded discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101615

    Original file (MD1101615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a careful review of the Applicant’s combat deployment history, combat injuries, in-service mental health issues, and diagnosed PTSD, coupled with the marital problems of the Applicant while deployed, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s PTSD and personal problems were mitigating and contributory factors in his misconduct.Given the facts of the record, the information provided by the Applicant, and the Applicant’s combat service, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s conduct, which...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200206

    Original file (MD1200206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a careful review of the Applicant’s combat deployment history and in-service medical records, coupled with his personal statement to the NDRB, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s contention of post-deployment stress and mental health problems were not mitigating or contributory factors to his misconduct; the record clearly reflected willful misconduct and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service.When the quality of a member’s service has met the standards of accepted conduct...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100172

    Original file (MD1100172.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant seeks an upgrade in characterization of service at discharge from a Bad Conduct Discharge to an Honorable discharge.The Applicant entered active duty service with a pre-service drug use waiver and counseling in writing that he fully understood the Marine Corps Policy on illegal drug use. The Applicant provided his post-service mental health treatment records that document he was evaluated and diagnosed with chronic PTSD.Though the Applicant had misconduct involving the illegal...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200202

    Original file (MD1200202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102142

    Original file (MD1102142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined that the evidence of record did establish the basis for discharge and that the Separation Authority actions were proper. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other...