Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800036
Original file (MD0800036.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070927
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: (administrative discharge board required but waived)
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN 6204.3

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20000228 - 20000312              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20000313               Period of enlistment : Years Months             Date of Discharge: 20000929
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 17 D ys      Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 68
MOS: 9971        Highest Rank:                            Fitness reports:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.6 ( 2 )/ 3.6 ( 2 )
 Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJPs :    

S CMs :            

SPCMs:  

CC:      

6105 Counseling :
         20000825 : For fraudulent enlistment .

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Desire to join Army (NDRB note: per reference letter)
2. Young and immature
3 . “Listened to recruiter ” to not to reveal criminal past
4. Voluntarily provided information after enlistment
5. Pre-service conviction expunged from record

Decision

Date: 20 08 0207             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall (administrative discharge                                                           board required but waived) .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant claims that he withheld information regarding his pre-service criminal and mental health history because of his youth, immaturity and lack of accountability. These reasons do not constitute a justification or excuse. The Applicant’s record demonstrates that he committed a serious offense by purposely fail ing to provide relevant information which, had it been known by competent authority at the time, would have prevented him from enlisting.

Issue 3 ( ). The government is entitled to a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs, and the Applicant’s unsupported implied allegation of recruiter misconduct does not overcome that presumption .

Issue 4 ( ). The Board found the Applicant’s claim to be misleading. The record demonstrates that the Applicant revealed his fraud after his mental health issues again became manifest while on active duty. The Board noted that those issues, had they been known, would have prevented the enlistment.

Issue 5 ( ). The Applicant submitted evidence indicating that the state of Utah had expunged his criminal record. The Board noted that, even if true, this action did not change the fact that the Applicant had a criminal record which he failed to reveal at the time of his enlistment. Further, this action had no impact on the Applicant’s mental health history, of which his failure to reveal in and of itself constituted a fraudulent enlistment even if he had never had a criminal record.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual ( MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug ust 19 95 until 31 Aug ust 2001, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 83 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800213

    Original file (MD0800213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700390

    Original file (ND0700390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ” “ MISCONDUCT ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700470

    Original file (ND0700470.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was one occasion of nonjudicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 107[False Official Statement (2 specifications)]. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801144

    Original file (ND0801144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined a change to the narrative reason for discharge would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201072

    Original file (ND1201072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700112

    Original file (ND0700112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) ) Administrative Board GCMCA review Administrative Board Date : NOT FOUND IN RECORD Findings, by preponderance of the evidence: NOT FOUND IN RECORDNOT FOUND IN RECORD Recommendation on Separation: NOT FOUND IN...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801162

    Original file (MD0801162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990630 - 2000109Active:19890918 - 1990020119930826 - 19950631UNABLE TO DETERMINE - 19960827 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000110Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20001016Length of Service: Yrs Mths07 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 67MOS: 6300Highest Rank: Fitness Reports: Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901076

    Original file (MD0901076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Board opined that the command’s pursuit of a discharge for the Applicant based on the suicidal gestures he displayed when he cut himself, consumed pills and threatened to hurt himself was reasonable, appropriate and supported by a medical diagnosis by a qualified provider.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800228

    Original file (ND0800228.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Immature Decision Date: 20080228Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701116

    Original file (MD0701116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. The...