Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800033
Original file (MD0800033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCPL, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070920
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN (unsatisfactory participation in the ready reserve)

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     NONE     
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19911113               Period of enlistment : Years             Date of Discharge: 19941027
Length of Service : Active: Yrs Mths 25 D ys Inactive: : Yrs Mths 21
Education Level: Age at Enlistment:     AFQT: 38
MOS: 0311        Highest Rank:                    
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.3(5) / 4.3(5)
 Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, Rifle EX

Periods of UA / CONF : NFIR

NJPs :     NFIR

6105 Counseling : NFIR

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Discharge too severe.
2. Post service.

Decision

Date: 20 08 0509 L ocation: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE .
Discussion

Issue 1 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. The Applicant contends his discharge characterization of service is too severe. The underlying cause of his misconduct is failure to participate in the ready reserve and honor the contract he voluntarily entered into with the United States Marine Corps. The record clearly reflects his willful unsatisfactory participation and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. There is credible evidence in the record the Applicant missed 10 drills in a row in a two month period. The Applicant has made no attempt to justify or excuse this behavior. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The characterization of service is within the standards of naval discipline. As such, the Board determined a n upgrade or change is un warranted.

Issue 2 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided proof of educational pursuits and a training certificate as evidence of post service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable and continuous employment record, a criminal background records check, and documentation of community service. The Board determined the Applicant’s post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge and an upgrade is not warranted.

A fter a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found















Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D, effective 890627 until 950817) states that a Marine may be separated for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve under criteria established in MCO P10014.1.

B. Marine Corps Reserve Administrative Management Manual, MCO P10014.1.

C. Table 6-1, Guide for Characterization of Service, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D, effective 890627 until 950817).

D . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00677

    Original file (MD00-00677.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. (Equity Issue) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. th Marine Division,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600719

    Original file (MD0600719.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Decisional Issues Equity: Isolated incident. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00998

    Original file (MD00-00998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 900522: Commanding officer notified the applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.900917: Commanding officer notified the applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.901020: Commanding officer notified the applicant of unsatisfactory drill...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01121

    Original file (MD03-01121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. 890811: Counseled for being recommended for an administrative discharge from the United States Marine Corps under other than honorable conditions for unsatisfactory participation due to missed Annual Training Duty. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500259

    Original file (MD0500259.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I feel that the other than honorable discharge is not representative of the service that I performed.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Letter from Applicant dated December 14, 2004 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00397

    Original file (MD00-00397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00397 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000208, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. (EQUITY ISSUE) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provision of SECNAVISNT 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. 910123: Letter of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00806

    Original file (MD03-00806.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington, D.C. area. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Applicant’s DD Form 215...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01123

    Original file (MD99-01123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. 931115: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01143

    Original file (MD01-01143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Failure to Participate (Reserve not on active duty) (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).Issue 1. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00865

    Original file (MD02-00865.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 for active duty period 901126 to 910513 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 891129 Date of Discharge: 920813 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 01 00 Inactive: 01 07 11 920710: GCMCA...