Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701248
Original file (ND0701248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MMFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070919
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900324 - 19901203                
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19901204               Period of enlistment : 4 Years             Date of Discharge: 19930512
Length of Service: Yrs Mths 21 D ys     Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 28
Highest Rank/Rate: MMFN   Evaluation marks: Performance: 3.1 ( 3 )   Behavior: 2.9 ( 4 )        OTA:     2.95 (3)
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): , , , and

Periods of UA/Confinement: 19910602 – 19910604 AND 19911223 - 19920106

NJPs:    19910617: Article 86 (unauthorized absence, 4 specifications) . Awarded - and
         19920109 : Article 86 (unauthorized absence, 4 specifications) . Awarded - and
         19920617: Article 134 (fail to pay just debts, 2 specifications). Awarded – RESTR
         19930402: Article 134 (fail to pay just debts, 2 specifications). Awarded – RESTR and EPD

Retention Warnings:     19910617 (unauthorized absence)
                           19920110 (sleeping on watch)
                           19920103 (unauthorized absence)

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:   Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representation:              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. I was discharged because of a fight with a Marine. I was never given a courts martial, or judicial punishment, no brig time, never received a reduction in rank. Do not believe actions warranted an other than honorable characterization of service.

Decision

Date: 2008 0131             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

Issue 1 ( ): The Applicant contends that his discharge was the result of a fight with a Marine and that his under other than honorable conditions characterization of service is inequitable. A other than honorable characterization of service is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by three retention warnings, four nonjudicial punishments for violations of UCMJ Articles 86 and 134 . These nonjudicial punishments form the basis for the Applicants administrative discharge based on a pattern of misconduct which is defined as t hree or more punishments during the same enlistment and/or a set pattern of failure to pay just debts . V iolations of UCMJ Article 134 carry a penalty of a bad conduct discharge and up to six months of imprisonment for each specification if adjudicated by a court martial. The Applicant was properly administratively processed for separation based on his established pattern of misconduct. During the Applicant’s administrative discharge he was notified of his impending discharge, of his right to consult counsel and be heard before an Administrative discharge board. The Applicant waived all rights and did not object to his discharge or the characterization of his service. After assuring compliance with MILPERSMAN 3630600 the separation authority directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. N othing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy. The Applicant’s conduct reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade in his characterization of service.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presume s regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence ( to include evidence submitted by the Applicant ) to rebut the presumption . After a thorough r eview of the available evidence to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, m edical and s ervice r ecord e ntries, d ischarge p rocess and evidence submitted b y the Applicant the Board found that


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00063

    Original file (ND03-00063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00063 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021008, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700527

    Original file (ND0700527.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change: Applicant’s Issues: 1. 134 (failure to pay just debts, 7 specifications) NSF checks and unpaid debts totaling $2227.28 for rent, uniforms and cash at NEX.Awarded - FOP ($630.00 for 2months) conditionally suspended for 6 months based on payments of just debts; RIR (E-4); Restr (30days); Extra duties (30days).NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date): NoneApplicant Testified: Applicant Available for Questions: Witnesses:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501554

    Original file (ND0501554.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). CNP.BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of pattern of misconduct. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600002

    Original file (ND0600002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700178

    Original file (ND0700178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01192

    Original file (ND03-01192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Board received the Applicant’s supporting documents on 20040920 and reconvened the Board on 20040921. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of naval service, if he desires further review of his case.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500829

    Original file (ND0500829.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard of acceptable conduct and performance, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700253

    Original file (ND0700253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19910515 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19910603) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19910617)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19920416 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00875

    Original file (ND04-00875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041008. No indication of appeal in the record.901014: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Dereliction of duty by sleeping during working hours.Award: Forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 1 month, extra duty for 45 days.901014: Reduction in rate from MMFN to MMFA suspended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00394

    Original file (ND03-00394.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Respectfully Request my discharge be changed and Reenlistment code be changed as well.” Documentation In addition to the service record, NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 920129 -...