Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701235
Original file (ND0701235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ENFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070912
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630600

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)     198506 18 - 19851113              Active: 19851114 – 19891113    
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19901219      Period of enlistment : Years Months     Date of Discharge: 19930202
Length of Service: Yrs Mths 00 D ys     Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 6 6
Highest Rank/Rate: EN3    Evaluation marks: Performance: N/A        Behavior: N/A     OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): NDSM, GWOTM, NUC, SSDR, Rifle , Pistol

Periods of UA/Confinement:

NJPs:   
         20060808 : Art(s) 86 (unauthorized absence) and 91 (insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer) . Awarded -    Susp -
        
SCMs:   
         20061106 : Art(s) 128 (Assault) AND 134 (Disorderly Conduct) . Sentence - and EMI
Retention Warnings:
         20060721 : For Violation of Art(s) 86, 91 and 92 .

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:   Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representation:              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)      



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Applicant is claiming no proof of a crime brought against him at Captains Mast.
2. Post service –Equity

Decision

Date: 20080124            Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .
Discussion

Issue 1 ( ): The Applicant is claiming no proof of a crime brought against him at Captains Mast. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the charge brought against the Applicant was not true. The Applicant ’ s statements alone do not overcome the government ’ s presumption of regularity in this case.

Issue 2 ( ): There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective
26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 128 and 134.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Recorder Review of Discharge Process

 Notification :
Applicant accurately notified of reason for discharge?                     Yes      No       Not found in record
Applicant accurately notified of least favorable characterization?       Yes      No       Not found in record
Applicant accurately notified of applicable rights?                        Yes      No       Not found in record

Rights Elected :  Not found in record
Counsel          Copies   Statement                GCMCA review     Administrative Board                      
Administrative Board      Not applicable          Waived   Not found in record
Reason(s) for discharge supported?                                           Yes      No       Not found in record
Recommendation?           Retain   Separate       
Recommendation for suspension?                                       Yes      No       Not found in record

CO recommendation:                Retain   Separate       

Proper Separation Authority?                                               Yes      No       Not found in record
Reason for discharge directed:   -
Characterization directed:               


Were factual requirements for separation met?                      Yes      No       Not found in record
Was retention warning required for reason for separation?                 Yes      No      
         Was retention warning given?                                Yes      No       Not found in record



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701197

    Original file (ND0701197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Yes No Not found in record Was retention warning required for reason for separation?

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701138

    Original file (MD0701138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 Aug 2001.B. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701140

    Original file (MD0701140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of misconduct in service was sufficient to warrant separation on that basis with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700136

    Original file (ND0700136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharger and characterization of his service. Awarded - FOP $200.00 -2 months; Restr - 30 days; Extra duties - 30 days.19991020: Retention Warning forfailure to obey a lawful written instruction (underage drinking).20000210: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701100

    Original file (ND0701100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sentence - Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700035

    Original file (ND0700035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: NOComplete Discharge Package: YES Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Issue 1 (Equity): The Applicant contends that his misconduct while in the Navy is attributable to his youth and immaturity at the time. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19950726Reason for Discharge - - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601183

    Original file (ND0601183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that By a vote of the Characterization shall . After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700094

    Original file (ND0700094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any/sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701139

    Original file (MD0701139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800711

    Original file (ND0800711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...