Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701209
Original file (ND0701209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MMFN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070910
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: PERSONALITY DISORDER
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1910-122

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19950422 - 19951204             
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19951205               Period of enlistment : Years             Date of Discharge: 19980429
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 25 D ys      Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:                AFQT: 73
Highest Rank /Rate : MMFN   Evaluation marks: Performance: N/A        Behavior: N/A              OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Navy “E” Ribbon (2), , and

Periods of UA /Confinement : 19970815-19970825 (10 D a ys)

NJPs :     19970828 : Art icle 86 (unauthorized absence) . Awarded - and Susp -
         19980305 : Art icle 115 (malingering) . Awarded - , , , and Susp -

Retention Warnings: 19970828 : For violation of UCMJ Article 86 ( unauthorized absence ) 1 9970815 to 19970825 .

Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:   Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe) Marriage Certificate



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. GI Bill
2. Personal desire to have a n honorable discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 08 0131             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): In the Applicant’s case the separation process was in strict compliance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual. The Applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a long standing personality disorder of such severity to render the Applicant unsuitable for continued naval service; furthermore the Applicant was determined to be a risk to harm self or others thereby allowing for expeditious processing. The Applicant waived his right to consult an attorney prior to discharge. The Board reviews the propriety and equity of each Applicant’s discharge individually. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with the standards of discipline of the n aval service. A general (under honorable conditions ) characterization of service is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The record documented the Applicant’s nonjudicial punishment and his 10 day unauthorized absence which occurred many months prior to his diagnosis of personality disorder. Based on the personality disorder diagnosis and subsequent processing in accordance with the MILPERSMAN 1910-122 the discharge was proper and a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service was warranted .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presume s regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence ( to include evidence submitted by the Applicant ) to rebut the presumption . After a thorough r eview of the available evidence to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, m edical and s ervice r ecord e ntries, d ischarge p rocess and evid ence submitted by the Applicant the Board found that


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until 31 Aug 1998, Article 1910-122 (formerly 3620225), SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PERSONALITY DISORDER(S).
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700613

    Original file (ND0700613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was diagnosed with "Personality Disorder with borderline features" by competent medical authority at the Mental Health Clinic, Naval Hospital, Portsmouth, VA, and was recommended for expeditious administrative separation from the Navy. 19920428 Medical Record: Reason for visit. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800351

    Original file (ND0800351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001707

    Original file (ND1001707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20000218 - 20000229Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20000301Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20020614Highest Rank/Rate:MMFNLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)14 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 31EvaluationMarks:Performance:2.5(2)Behavior:2.0(2)OTA: 2.34Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701204

    Original file (ND0701204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record documents the deferred diagnosis of personality disorder which the Applicant refers to in her application. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000362

    Original file (ND1000362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900966

    Original file (ND0900966.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on a review of the available service of record, the Board determined the documentation and statement provided by the Applicant were not sufficient to refute the evidence of record as previously discussed which demonstrates that the Applicant was properly diagnosed with a personality disorder. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000378

    Original file (ND1000378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301630

    Original file (ND1301630.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends his Narrative Reason for Separation is unfair and improper, because he was never counseled in accordance with MILPERSMAN Article 1910-122 and was not given an opportunity to correct his deficiencies.In the absence of a complete discharge package and the Applicant’s complete medical record, the NDRB presumed regularity of governmental affairs in the Applicant’s diagnosis of a Personality Disorder. ” After a complete review of the records and documentation provided by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700809

    Original file (ND0700809.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ 02 02 13 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601177

    Original file (ND0601177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000525Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000525Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Separation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL TECHNICAL TRAINING CENTER, CORRY STATION, PENSACOLA (20000613)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant...