Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701113

Original file (ND0701113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SMSA, USN
ND07-01113

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070810 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3610240

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Youth and Immaturity
                           2. Post svc

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 08 0117             Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ). The Applicant admits that he made a mistake but contends that h is discharge should be upgraded because he was young age and immature and did not realize the consequences of his actions. The NDRB acknowledges the Applicant's regret in his choice to abuse drugs and his realization that he displayed a lack of judgment at the time he was in service. However, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of the Applicant’s case.

Issue 2 ( ). The Board advises the Applicant that there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment records, and documentation of community service, are examples of verifiable documentation that should be provided to receive consideration for relief based on post-service conduct. The Board acknowledges the Applicant's numerous character reference s , and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities , as evidenced by the documents submitted, but, at this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19920731 - 19930322              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19930323               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19940915
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 05 Mths 23 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 57          Highest Rank /Rate : SMSA
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.8 ( 2 )       Behavior: 3.3 ( 2 )                  OTA: 3.70
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDM, SSDR, SASM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19940809 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19940801 , tested positive for ( THC ).

19940812 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use, possession, ect., of controlled substances .
         Awarded - Restr for ( 45 days) or until discharge ; Extra duties ( 45 days) or until discharge .

19940831:        DAAR: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report indicates marijuana abuse as a result of a random urinalysis, found not dependent , recommended for separation not via VA.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19940817
Reason for Discharge:     -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19940817
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 199408 25 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS WASHINGTON DC ( 19930831 ) ?
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19940915

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Cover Letter from North Carolina Department of Administration

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700800

Original file (ND0700800.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

94-921 Applicant Discharged: 19940915 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board Related to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representative: Other Documentation (Describe) Pertinent Regulation/Law A. You may view DoD...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800618

Original file (ND0800618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700490

Original file (ND0700490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, there was no justification for upgrading the Applicant’s characterization of discharge based on a material change in the law.Issue3 (Propriety):The Applicant further contends that he was incorrectly diagnosed,by the Navy,as having a Personality Disorder.His claim andrequest for the narrative reason be changed to Adjustment Disorder is based on a diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder,made by his psychologist, one year prior to Applicant’s enlistment into Navy. Discharge Process Date...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902447

Original file (ND0902447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700847

Original file (ND0700847.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date: 20071220Location:Washington D.C Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900520

Original file (ND0900520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USAR19940915 - 19950329Active: USNR (DEP) 19950425 - 19951228 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19951229Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19960318Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 34EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800043

Original file (ND0800043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801506

Original file (ND0801506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.Besides the personal statement provided on the DD Form-293, the Applicant The Board determined based on the limited documentation provided and the circumstances surrounding the situation that an upgrade would...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101489

Original file (ND1101489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant desires change to characterization to support employment opportunities.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901237

Original file (ND0901237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An administrative separation board was convened and the members found by a vote of 3to 0 that the preponderance of the evidence supported a basis for discharge due to drug abuse and by a unanimous vote the administrative board recommended separation with an Other Than Honorable characterization of service. Taking into consideration the evidence of record, the Applicant’s years of service, age, experience, offenses and his personal statement the Board has determined that an upgrade is not...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701113

Similar Decisions