Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700976
Original file (ND0700976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-MASN, USN
ND07-00976
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070710   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN        Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-124

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. VA Benefits
                           2. Applicant did not know she was receiving a General characterization until the last minute and contends there was little to no assistance in the transition process.
3. Characterization was inequitable based on her Service Record and one isolated incident.
                          

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN .

Date: 20 080110                   Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 : ( ). Applicant contends that she did not know she was receiving a General characterization until the last minute and contends there was little to no assistance in the transition process. The record reflects that in the administrative separation process notification that she acknowledged that she was being recommended for administrative separation due to misconduct-commission of a serious offense and for convenience of the government – parenthood and that the least favorable characterization that she could receive was General (Under honorable conditions). While her Commanding Officer recommended an Honorable characterization, COMNAVPERSCOM directed a General (under honorable conditions). With reference to the Applicant’s contention of little to no assistance during the transition process, the Board found no such documentation in the record to support the Applicant’s contention.

Issue 3 : ( ). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. T he Applicant contends that her service was honorable with the exception of one isolated incident. When a Sailor ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general (under honorable conditions) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warnings and one nonjudicial punishment for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 92 (Dereliction of duty) and Article 134 (Adultery). Violations of Article 92 and 134 are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate .
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found th at


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ 01 DEC 12 ”
         “ 03 06 15 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20011107 - 20011211              Active:          19940706 - 19940802
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20011212      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 20050615
Length of Service : 3 Yrs 6 Mths 15 D ys    Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 67          Highest Rank /Rate : MA3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 2.5 ( 4 )       Behavior: 2.35 ( 4 )         OTA: 2.87
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, PISTOL SHOT MARKSMANSHIP RIBBON, RIFLEMAN MARKSMANSHIP RIBBON.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge
20040504 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Dereliction of Duty, Art. 134 – Adultery .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 747.00 ) for ( 1 months) susp for 6 months ; RIR ( E-3 ); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

20040511 :        Retention Warning for NJP for violation of Art 92 and 134.

20050218:        Applicant requests separation (Excerpt from CO’s comments to COMNAVPERSCOM recommendation for administrative separation)

20050302:        Retention Warning for Inability to comply with Department of the Navy Family Care Certificate Plan .

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20050311
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20050311
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050413 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMNAVPERSCOM ( 20050526 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050615

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 11, effective 20 May 2005 until 28 March 2006, Article 1910-124, Separation by reason of Convenience of the Government - Parenthood.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 134.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700757

    Original file (ND0700757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s service conduct and performance, the NDRB concluded that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s discharge characterization and directs the characterization of service be changed to Honorable. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01316

    Original file (ND04-01316.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01316 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040818. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the Applicant’s case, the separation authority, COMNAVPERSCOM, directed that the characterization of service should be the “type warranted by service record.” A review of the Applicant’s records indicated an honorable discharge was warranted.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501287

    Original file (ND0501287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “Hardship”. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “hardship”.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700764

    Original file (ND0700764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-EM3, USN ND07-00764 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20070515 Characterization Received: Narrative Reason: PARENTHODD OR CUSTODIAN OF MINOR CHILDREN Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-124 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: FAMILY HARDSHIP Applicant’s Issues: 1. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.” Additional Reviews: Subsequent to a document...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600007

    Original file (ND0600007.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Four pages from Applicant’s service record High Honor award, Weber State University, Summer 2004-05 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001335

    Original file (ND1001335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issue: The Applicant contends that her characterization of service at discharge was inequitable as it was based on one isolated incident in over 35 months of otherwise honorable service, she was discharged due to parenthood - not for misconduct, and her performance and conduct of record warrant a characterization of Honorable. The Applicant’s service record documents...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600111

    Original file (ND0600111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I received my Good Conduct Medal and, other then being unable to sign the Family Care Plan, had no incidents in those four years. I am now resubmitting, but it is not to add additional issues, justification or evidence.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600016

    Original file (ND0600016.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00016 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050927. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20021003 by reason of convenience of the government due to parenthood or custody of minor children (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01319

    Original file (ND04-01319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Copy of the Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 991023 - 000328 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 000329 Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601199

    Original file (ND0601199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity – In service performance2. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge, and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030521Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to...