Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700813

Original file (ND0700813.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ATAR, USN
ND07-00813

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070531 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-144

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:      1. VA Benefits
                           2. Personality conflict with his Master Chief
                           3. Parents’ health issues and immaturity were the basis of his poor attitude

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20071220             Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant implies that h is Master Chief did not like him. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that his Master Chief unfairly singled him out for ridicule or discipline. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

Issue 3 ( ). The Applicant contends that his problems were attributed to the poor health of his parents and his immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Sailor ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of two nonjudicial punishment (NJP), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 121 (Larceny) , and conviction in a civil court for Driving Under the Influence, Reckless Driving, Urinating in Public, and Passing on the Shoulder. Violation of UCMJ Article 121 and the civilian conviction of driving under the influence are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20000525 - 20000731              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20000801     Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20030613
Length of Service: 2 Yrs 10 Mths 9 D ys   Lost Time: 4 Days UA: 4 Days Confined:
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 63          Highest Rank/Rate: ATAN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 2.0 ( 2 )      Behavior: 1.5 ( 2 )         OTA: 2.0
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20020506         Applicant convicted of DUI in Virginia Beach District Court

20020909:        Applicant convicted of urinating in public in Virginia Beach District Court

20021025:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Unauthorized Absence .
         Awarded - FOP ($289.00) for (1 months); RIR (E-2); Restr for (14 days); Extra duties (14 days).

20021216:        Applicant convicted in absentia of passing on the shoulder by Virginia Beach District Court

20030123:        Applicant convicted of reckless driving (90 in a 55) by Virginia Beach District Court. Sentenced to 6 months confinement (all but 22 days suspended), $150.00 fine and court costs

20030128:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Self referral for depressed mood
         Diagnosis: No suggestion to the presence of a major mood or anxiety disorder
         Recommendation: Psychologically fit for duty. Patient is fully responsible for himself and his actions.

20030210:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Unauthorized Absence (3 specs); Art. 121 - Larceny .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 575 .00) for (2 months); RIR (E- 1 ); Restr for (45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

20030219:        Convicted of probation violations by Virginia Beach District Court. Sentenced to vacation of suspended confinement

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20030219
Reason for Discharge:    -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20030219
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         (NOT FOUND IN RECORD)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Administrative Board Date :       20030422
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY - .

         BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
Recommendation on Separation: BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20030604 )
Separation Authority (date):     Commander, Navy Region, Mid Atlantic (20030610)
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20030613

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:     Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-144 (previously 3630610), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Civilian Conviction.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700635

Original file (ND0700635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not sufficient to mitigate the misconduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ...
NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00802

Original file (ND01-00802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :980402: Civil Conviction: General District Court, Traffic Division, Virginia Beach, VA for violation of driving under the influence (3 rd offense) and refusal to permit a sample of blood or breath to be taken to determine drug/alcohol content on 17Aug97.Sentence: Not listed. Therefore, I concur with the Administrative Board's recommendation that BM2 (applicant) be separated in absentia from the Navy with an Other Than Honorable...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800153

Original file (ND0800153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601087

Original file (ND0601087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Equity – In Service Conduct Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990219 - 19990630 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990701Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20020509 Length of Service: Active: 02Yrs 10 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20000419: Civil Conviction: General District Court, Traffic Division, Chesapeake, Virginia for...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00818

Original file (ND03-00818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND03-00818 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030409. 011128: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had not committed commission of a serious offense and found that Applicant had committed civilian conviction and drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions and recommended by a vote of 2 to 1...
NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00446

Original file (ND03-00446.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 981117 - 990929 COG Active: None Period of...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500374

Original file (ND1500374.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00071

Original file (ND00-00071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 850830 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct pattern frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities (A and B). After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500712

Original file (ND0500712.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests his characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19991203 – 20000619 Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20000620 Date of Discharge: 20031105 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 02 11 (Does not exclude lost time.) Accordingly, I emphatically...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700055

Original file (ND0700055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AOAN, USNND07-00055Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20061017Characterization of Service: Reason for Discharge: - Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN1910-144Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: VFA 87 NAS OCEANA, VAApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation:Issues (as summarized by NDRB): 1. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700813

Similar Decisions