ex-AA, USN
                                 ND07-00765

                  Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received:  20070515   Characterization Received:
Narrative  Reason:   FRAUDULENT  ENTRY   INTO   MILITARY   SERVICE   (OTHER)
Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-134

Applicant’s Request:   Characterization change to:
                 Narrative Reason change to: HONORABLE DISCHARGE
Applicant’s Issues:    1. RE Code change
                 2. Claims the Recruiter told her acknowledge one use of
marijuana and her petty office during training told her to admit that she
would hurt herself and others.

                                  Decision

By a vote of  the Characterization shall  .
By a vote of  the Narrative Reason shall  FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY
SERVICE (OTHER).

Date:  20071213        Location:  Washington D.C    Representation:

                                 Discussion

Issue 1:   either  which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the
Applicant, or  the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief
for which the Applicant petitioned.  The Applicant is directed to the
Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: (). The Applicant contends that she was honest to her recruiter
concerning her use of marijuana but the recruiter told her to mention use
as a single incident.   During training, the Applicant contends that her
petty officer told her that if she wanted out of the Navy, all she had to
do was tell him the she felt like hurting herself and others.  The
government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its
affairs.  The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption
through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support
his issue.  There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant
produced any evidence, to support her contention.  The Board found that the
Applicant’s discharge was initiated based on a recommendation by competent
medical authorities.  It was noted that during this evaluation that the
Applicant admitted the extent of her marijuana and alcohol use.  Based upon
the recommendation by competent medical authority, the discharge process
was initiated for adjustment disorder.  The command, now with the admission
of the Applicant’s use of marijuana, elected to process the Applicant for
discharge for two reasons: Convenience of the government due to physical or
mental conditions as evidenced by an adjustment disorder and Defective
enlistment and induction due to fraudulent enlistment as evidenced by
failure to disclose pre-serve drug history.  The Board noted that the
Applicant waived her right to: 1) consult with counsel, 2) submit a written
statement, or 3) have General Court-Martial convening authority review her
case.  With no objection by the Applicant for either reason for discharge,
the command directed fraudulent enlistment.  The Board determined that
changing the Narrative Reason for discharge would not be appropriate.

The Applicant should be aware that, by regulation, members notified of
intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of
enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation
characterization of service.  Unless there were unusual circumstances
regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an
honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally
considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service.
The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances
during her less than 6 months in the military prior to notification of
separation to warrant a change of discharge to honorable.  Therefore the
Board found his uncharacterized characterization appropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of
Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut
the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.  After a
thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s
Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process
and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

                             Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)   20020927 - 20030428         Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20030429 Years Contracted:  ; Extension:        Date of
Discharge:  20030702
Length of Service:  0  Yrs  2  Mths  4  Dys  Lost Time:  Days UA:    Days
Confined:
Education Level:       Age at Enlistment:    AFQT:  34   Highest Rank/Rate:
 AA
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):      Performance:       (  )
Behavior:       (  )    OTA:       
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):  NONE

  Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or
                             Basis for Discharge

20020923:   Military Record of Processing: Applicant admits to one time use
           of marijuana.

20030613:   Medical Record:  Reason for visit:  Mental Health
           Assessment     
      Diagnosis:  Adjustment Disorder with depressed mood; Alcohol abuse;
           Cannabis abuse.
      Recommendation:  Entry Level Separation due to disqualifying
           psychiatric condition.

                              Discharge Process

Date Notified:                          20030625     
Reason for Discharge:   -
       -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:          20030625
Rights Elected at Notification:
      Consult with Counsel
      Obtain Copies of Documents
      Submit Statement(s) (date)
      Administrative Board
      GCMCA review


Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):     (20030626)
Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING OFFICER RTC (20030626)
              Reason for discharge directed:  -
              Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:   20030702

      Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:         Other
Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
      Employment:                 Finances:                   Education:

      Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:
Criminal Records:
      Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:
References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:   From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)


                          Pertinent Regulation/Law

A.  The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued
October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-
134 (previously 3630100), Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and
Inductions - Fraudulent Entry Into the Naval Service.

B.  Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211,
Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503,
Equity.


                  ADDENDUM:  Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures:  If you believe that the decision in your case is
unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise
comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction
1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of
that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP,
The Pentagon, Washington, DC  20301-4000.  You should read Enclosure (5) of
the Instruction before submitting such a complaint.  The complaint
procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is
designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable
requirements for clarity and responsiveness.  You may view DoD Instruction
1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at
“http://Boards.law.af.mil.”

Additional Reviews:  Subsequent to a document review, former members are
eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is
received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.  The
Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service
accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge.
Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not
required.  If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years,
has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise
exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC
20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits:  The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for
post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.  There is no
requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of
obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a
foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities:  The Board has no authority to
upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or
educational opportunities.  Regulations limit the Board’s review to a
determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code:  Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over
reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any
other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a
reenlistment code.  Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
can make changes to reenlistment codes.  Additionally, the Board has no
authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing
reenlistment opportunities.  An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a
bar to reenlistment.  A request for a waiver can be submitted during the
processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct:  DoD disability regulations do not
preclude a disciplinary separation.  Appropriate regulations stipulate that
separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for
other reasons.  Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical
Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative
involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is
suspended.  The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending
the outcome of the non-disability proceedings.  If the action includes
either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical
board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record.
Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative
reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.”
Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of
narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an
unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time
or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service.  The
NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the
recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a
basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and
conduct during the period of service under review.  Examples of
documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of
educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of
community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and
certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD) – Because relevant and
material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the
NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence
of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief.
With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the
NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.  Clemency is an act of
leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership:  The names and votes of the members of the Board are
recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the
service records by writing to:

                         Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                         Attn:  Naval Discharge Review Board
                         720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                         Washington Navy Yard DC  20374-5023