Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700753
Original file (ND0700753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-EMFN, USN
ND07-00753
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070515   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT     Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630600

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Inequitable discharge based on performance and prior honorable discharge
                           2. Good citizen since discharge

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall : .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall : MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 071213                   Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

Discussion
Issue 1 ( ). Applicant contends that it is an injustice for him to continue to suffer from adverse consequences of his discharge and states that based on current standards, and his good performance , a s evidenced by his awards and decorations , an upgrade is warranted. The NDRB advises the Applicant that, despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant's misconduct is documented in his service record, which is marred by two non judicial punishments for VUCMJ, Art. 89 and 91, disrespectful conduct, and Art. 134, drunk and disorderly conduct . Applying current standards of review, th is misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant also contends that an upgrade is warranted because he had a prior honorable discharge . Pursuant to MILPERSMAN 1910-306, characterization of service will be determined solely on the period of the current enlistment or period of service to which the separation pertains. The board considered the entries in the member’s record pertaining to this enlistment only in determining whether his characterization was equitable. No other narrative reason for separation or characterization could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged.

Issue 2 ( ). There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider an upgrade.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 900906-940824 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command , that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19900517 - 19900905              Active:          19900906 - 19940824
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19940825      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 19960106
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 04 Mths 12 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 3 7          Highest Rank /Rate : EM3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.8 ( 1 )       Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )                  OTA: 3.6
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, SASM with bronze star, SSDR, NGCA

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19940825:        Reenlisted this date for a term of 4 years.
19941216 :        NJP -- VUCMJ Art. 89 – Disrespect toward a Commissioned Officer; V UCMJ Art. 91 – Disrespect toward a petty officer; V UCMJ, Art. 134 – Incapacitation for duty .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 500.00 ) for ( 2 months) suspended for 6 months ; RIR ( E-3 ) suspended for 6 months ; Restr for ( 30 days); Extra duties ( 30 days) .
19950131:        Forfeiture of pay and reduction in pay grade suspended at NJP on 19951216 vacated due to continued misconduct.
19950131 :        NJP -- VUCMJ Art. 134 – (2 Specs), Drunk and disorderly . Awarded - RIR ( E-2 ) suspended for 6 months .
19950621:        Applicant completed Level III rehabilitation.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       19951117
Reason for Discharge:     -
        
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19951117
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19951214 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS WASHINGTON DC ( 19951228 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19960106

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700541

    Original file (ND0700541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s summary of service clearly documents the Applicants misconduct resulting in a civilian conviction and four nonjudicial punishments for violations of UCMJ Articles 86 (unauthorized absence, four specifications), 92 (failure to obey), 107 (false official statement, two specifications) and 128 (assault). The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and the characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800627

    Original file (ND0800627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) Resume DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700345

    Original file (ND0700345.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge:-Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20000929...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700492

    Original file (ND0700492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3 (): When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19870207 - 19870503Active: 19870504 - 19930414 Period of Service Under Review:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700594

    Original file (ND0700594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change: Applicant’s Issues:1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: 19940411 – 19940605 COG Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940606Years Contracted:2Date of Discharge:19951117Length...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100517

    Original file (ND1100517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301120

    Original file (ND1301120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700277

    Original file (ND0700277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In service - Equity2. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19941122) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS (19941209)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19941216 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700663

    Original file (ND0700663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20010912 - 20010927Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010928Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060518Length of Service: 04 Yrs 07Mths21 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001643

    Original file (MD1001643.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted for any other reason (e. g., member meets minimum criteria for misconduct processing). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews :...