Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700736
Original file (ND0700736.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AZ3, USN
ND07-00736
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070419   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT          Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630600

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. RE Code change
                           2. Lack of due process; discharge based on DUI “zero tolerance” policy
                           3. Post-service conduct

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 071213             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant implies that he was improperly discharged not on the merits of his case, but because his commanding officer had a “zero tolerance” policy towards driving under the influence (DUI) offenses. His record, although incomplete, indicates that he had 2 nonjudicial punishments (NJP) in a 3 month period. There is also evidence in the Applicant’s medical record to support the conclusion that the Applicant’s offenses were alcohol related. The Applicant does not allege, and the Board found no reason to conclude, that the Applicant was not afforded his rights during his Captain’s Mast or in regard to the subsequent administrative separation process. Based on the separation code on his DD 214, the Board concluded that the Applicant waived his right to contest the proposed separation and possible characterization of service at an administrative discharge board. The Applicant claims that the DUI allegation against him was subsequently dismissed; however, the Board advises the Applicant that this is not dispositive of his case. There are a variety of reasons why an allegation might be dismissed other than a lack of guilt. (In this regard, the Board noted that the Applicant did not deny having committed the offense.) Further, just as the Applicant’s NJP does not determine the results of his subsequent court, so the subsequent court decision does not necessarily invalidate the NJP. Each forum makes its own independent d etermination based its assessment of the facts. Therefore, t he Board found no impropriety in the Applicant’s discharge. However, the Board did find th at, under all the circumstances of the case and in light of the Applicant’s excellent service throughout his enlistment , th e Applicant’s characterization of service was inconsistent with standards of naval discipline and therefore inequitable .

Issue 3 ( ). The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. T here is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. Although the Board did determine, as noted above, that an upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) was warranted based on the Applicant’s overall service record , it further determined, a s of this time , that the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider further mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 870820 UNTIL 940928 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (ActMar)   19831020 - 19840430                       Active:          19840501 - 19870819
                                                                                          19870820 - 19901024
                                                                                          19901025 - 19920827
                                                                                          19920828 - 19940928

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19940929                        Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 19980722
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 09 Mths 24 D ys                   Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:                  Age at Enlistment:                AFQT: 31                   Highest Rank /Rate : AZ1
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 4.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 4.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 4.00       4.0 scale
                                    Performance: 4.0 ( 4 )      Behavior: 4.0 ( 4 )         OTA: 3.95       5.0 scale
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SSDR (3), CNO AVIATION SAFETY AWARD, NDSM, SASM, KLM, MUC, NAM, NAVY "E", GCM (3), AFSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19980316:        NJP. No further information found in service record.

 19980517:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: 0455, brought by Security because of tingling in left thumb due to tightness of handcuffs. States only 2 beers about 2200. Security reports BAC .15 btwn 2221 – 0350.
         Diagnosis: Numbness and tingling due to handcuffs being too tight.
         Recommendation: Return 24-48 hours for re-evaluation; release to Security.

19980618:        Suspension of RIR awarded at NJP on 19980316 vacated due to continued misconduct.

19980618 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 111 - Operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 766.00 ) for ( 1 month); RIR ( E-4 ); Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days) .
19980619:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Referred by SCPO for possible suicidal ideation due to recent Captain’s mast .      
         Diagnosis: Not suicidal, no further workup indicated.
         Recommendation: Fit for full duty.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge:    
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
 Reason for discharge directed: 
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19980722

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:             Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 December 1997 until 21 August 2002,
Article 1910-140, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 , Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, aircraft, or vessel .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800762

    Original file (MD0800762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800152

    Original file (ND0800152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19961226Period of enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 19980406Length of Service: Yrs Mths11 Dys Education Level: Age at Enlistment: AFQT: 43Highest Rank/Rate: MSSN Evaluation marks: Performance: 3.0(3) Behavior: 2.3(3) OTA: 2.83 Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): BER, , Periods of UA/CONF:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001889

    Original file (ND1001889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmentalaffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700644

    Original file (ND0700644.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601199

    Original file (ND0601199.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity – In service performance2. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge, and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20030521Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801537

    Original file (ND0801537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (CIVILIAN CONVICTION).Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Based on the Applicant’s repeated poor choice of driving while under the influence of alcohol and his failure to reveal his first civil conviction, the Board determined an upgrade was not warranted.After a thorough review of the available...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301127

    Original file (MD1301127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant was not administratively separated, but was discharged at the end of his obligated service with the characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500133

    Original file (MD1500133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700492

    Original file (ND0700492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3 (): When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19870207 - 19870503Active: 19870504 - 19930414 Period of Service Under Review:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201265

    Original file (ND1201265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service, UCMJ violations, and alcohol rehabilitation failure. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...