Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700726

Original file (ND0700726.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AKAN, USN
ND07-00726

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070507 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Characterization not warranted by overall service record
                           2. Post-service conduct

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 071205             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ). The Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable as it was based on “very few instances in 36 months of service with no other adverse actions.” The NDRB advises the Applicant that, despite a service member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even if isolated, warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant's misconduct is documented in his service record, which is marred by the finding at a nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceeding on 19960207 of 6 violations of Article 112a of the UCMJ, wrongful use of a controlled substance. Any one of the Applicant’s violations was sufficient to warrant discharge under other than honorable conditions. Individuals are indoctrinated from the day of recruitment, and have had the policy reinforced through annual Navy-wide training sessions throughout their enlistment, on the U.S Navy’s zero tolerance policy for substance abuse, and that a violation of this policy will result in mandatory processing for administrative separation which usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge. This policy is well known throughout both the Department of Defense and the civilian sector as well. Accordingly, this misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. No other narrative reason for separation or characterization could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged.

Issue 2 ( ). There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19921228 - 19930207              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19930208      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 19960321
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 01 Mths 14 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 78          Highest Rank /Rate : AK3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.9 ( 3 )       Behavior: 4.0 ( 3 )          OTA: 3.93
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, MUC, SSDR, SWASM, OSR

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19960206:        Applicant provided voluntary statement to NCIS admitting his personal involvement with illegal drugs.

1996 0207 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – (6 Specs) : (1–3) Introduce, distribute, use LSD about 19960615 , (4-6) use LSD about late June, July and (x2) August.
         Awarded - FOP ( 1/2 pay ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-3 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19960208
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -
Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19960208
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19960212 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS ( 19960313 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19960321

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:             Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100863

Original file (ND1100863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701111

Original file (ND0701111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The imposition of punishment at captain’s mast does not bar one’s separation authority from taking administrative action to discharge a member from the military, if the requirements of MILPERSMAN 1910-010 and other pertinent sections are met. Discharge Process Charge(s) Preferred: 19960105 Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 121: (1 Spec) Steal 2 credit cards, (7 Specs) Steal United States currency of a value of $1200.00 the property of Central Fidelity Bank, Richmond, Virginia.Date...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000765

Original file (MD1000765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge in administrative separations or clemency in the case of a court-martial-awarded punitive discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, Special Court-Martial Record of Trial and punitive discharge process, the Board found the discharge was equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300251

Original file (MD1300251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801863

Original file (ND0801863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

While the Applicant may feel his family circumstances contributed to his misconduct, the record of evidencedoes not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his misconduct or should not be held accountable for his actions due to his wife’s pregnancy or his youth and immaturity.The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade based on the Applicant’s claim of mitigating circumstances would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900627

Original file (ND0900627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of Article 112a (Drug use) is one such offense requiring mandatory separation regardless of time in service, grade or record of service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700574

Original file (MD0700574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In service - Equity2. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19890518 - 19890705Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19890706Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19930621Length of Service: 03 Yrs 11Mths17 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700362

Original file (MD0700362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19950120 - 19950626 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19950627Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19970319Length of Service: 01 Yrs 08Mths23 DysLost Time:Days UA: 39 Days Confined: 55Education Level:...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801694

Original file (MD0801694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant submitted evidence showing long-term employment and the completion of an Associates Degree. An upgrade founded upon good post-service conduct would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101963

Original file (MD1101963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)19980430 - 19980518Active: 19900109 - 19960108 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19980519Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20030314Highest Rank:Length of Service: Years Months04 DaysEducation Level: AFQT:56MOS: 3533Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700726

Similar Decisions