Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700531

Original file (ND0700531.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-DCFR, USN
ND07-00531

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070308 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Reenlistment Opportunities
                           2. Immature in Service and one isolated incident
                           3. Punishment not proportional to other members of the Command
4. Post Service

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 071108 Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant contends that his problems were attributed to his immaturity and anger . While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Sailor ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning , the award of one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) , Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance) and Article 134 (Drinking underage) . Violation of UCMJ Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 : ( ). The Applicant implies that he was more severely punished than other members of the command. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he was wrongfully charged and disciplined. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

Issue 4: (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided two honorable discharges from the National Guard, a community college certificate of completion, and a certificate of achievement for a Fire Fighting Academy. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 19940504-19941120
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:      19941121 Years Contracted : ; Extension:        Date of Discharge: 19960209
Length of Service : 1 Yrs 2 Mths 18 D ys    Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 45          Highest Rank /Rate : DCFN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: NONE FOUND IN THE RECORD
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19951006:        Retention Warning for Alcohol Abuse.

19951101:        Applicant Unauthorized Absence from USS DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER (30 Minutes)

19951214 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of marijuana; Art. 134 – Drinking underage
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 427 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-1 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

19960116:        Applicant requests Administrative Leave (without pay and allowance) pending completion of his Administrative Separation Case.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19951214
Reason for Discharge:     -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19951214
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19951227 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS ( 19960122 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19960209

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual Article . (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective 22 Jul y 199 94 until
2 Oct ober 19 96, Article 3630620, S eparation of Enlisted Members by reason of Misconduct due to Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901056

Original file (ND0901056.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation was mandatory.The Applicant was afforded an Administrative Separation Board, which voted 3-0 to separate the member from the military for misconduct due to drugs. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700377

Original file (MD0700377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19920629 - 19920803 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19920804Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 19951214Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths 28 DysLost Time:Days UA: NONE Days Confined:...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000729

Original file (MD1000729.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210,...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801560

Original file (ND0801560.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19951214 - 19960421Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960422Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19961108Length of Service: Years Months17 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 92Highest Rank/Rate:SNEvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIR Behavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301197

Original file (ND1301197.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND13-01197 a - ex-EM3, USN CURRENT DISCHARGE AND APPLICANT’S REQUEST Application Received: 20130524 Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) MISCONDUCT Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MILPERSMAN 1910-146 [DRUG ABUSE] Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service: a Inactive: USNR...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700362

Original file (MD0700362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19950120 - 19950626 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19950627Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19970319Length of Service: 01 Yrs 08Mths23 DysLost Time:Days UA: 39 Days Confined: 55Education Level:...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1101321

Original file (ND1101321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Applicant’s record of...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101600

Original file (ND1101600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined that clemency based on this issue was not warranted. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since fifteen years from the date of the Applicant’s discharge have elapsed, he is not eligible for a personal appearance hearing with...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700151

Original file (ND0700151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred byone nonjudicial punishment for violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 [Unauthorized Absence (two specifications)], Article 91 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 134 (Alter public Record).Additionally, the record reflects the Applicant violated the UCMJ, Article 86 [Unauthorized...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601170

Original file (ND0601170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. 19960305: BUPERS directed USS FIFE to reprocess Applicant for administrative separation for misconduct due to drug abuse using administrative board procedures. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700531

Similar Decisions