Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700529

Original file (ND0700529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-IC2, USN
ND07-00529

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070315 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT-DRUG ABUSE (Use) Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Immature in Service
                           2. Post Service

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT-DRU G ABUSE (USE) .

Date: 20 07110 8 Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1: ( ). The Applicant contends that his problems were attributed to his immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Sailor ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general ( under honorable conditions ) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance) Violation of UCMJ Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 2: (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided only his statement claiming to be a model citizen. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board found that the Applicant's undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      -              Active:          19770506 - 19810513
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:      19900928          Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19930620
Length of Service : 2 Yrs 8 Mths 23 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 33     AFQT: 45          Highest Rank /Rate : IC1
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.9 ( 5 )       Behavior: 3.3 ( 5 )          OTA:
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL (2), NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDAL (2), BATTLE “E” EFFICIENCY AWARD, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION AWARD, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), JOINT MERITORIOUS UNIT AWARD (2).

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19900928:        Applicant reenlists for 4 years.

19920817 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19920810 , tested positive for ( Cocaine) .

19920803 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Usage of a Controlled Substance .
         Awarded - FOP ( $745.80 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-5 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .

19920914:        Applicant signs Statement; I understand that I have been found to be psychologically/physically dependent on drugs and/or alcohol and that I have the right to request in-patient treatment at a VA Hospital nearest my home of record or place of residence for rehabilitation prior to discharge. Applicant desires to accept VA treatment.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19920901
Reason for Discharge:     -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19921005
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         NOT FOUND IN RECORD
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review                                NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Administrative Board Date :
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:    BY - .

         BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
Recommendation on Separation: BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS ( 19930325 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19930620

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . Naval Military Personnel Manual Article . Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, S eparation of Enlisted members by reason of Misconduct due to Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701136

Original file (MD0701136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Susp - ,.19910830: Art 86. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Court-Martial proceedings, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenseshe committed. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901061

Original file (ND0901061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800929

Original file (MD0800929.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200171

Original file (ND1200171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: NONE By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600482

Original file (ND0600482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issues, as stated Equity – Post Service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Character Reference ltr from D_ W. M_, Ed.D., Executive Director, Teen Challenge of the Midwest, dtd February 1, 2006Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19900928 - 19910714 COG Active: USA-NG 19900306 –...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800852

Original file (ND0800852.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided no post service documentation and his statements alone concerning his post-service conduct were not considered valid documentation. The Board determined an upgrade based on this...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801778

Original file (ND0801778.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB is unable to consider the Applicant’s request for an upgrade to “Uncharacterized” since he had more than four years of active duty time at the time of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701024

Original file (ND0701024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In service - Equity2. No other narrative reason for separation or characterization could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged.Issue 2 (): The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his personal problems. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700308

Original file (ND0700308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discharge Process Date Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Administrative Board: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORD Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge directed: NOT...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800576

Original file (ND0800576.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700529

Similar Decisions