Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700524

Original file (ND0700524.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MASN, USN
ND07-00524

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070315 Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-142

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:      1. VA Benefits
                           2. Discharge was extreme and unjust
4. Service Record


Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE) .

Date: 20 080110 Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issues 1 & 2: ( ). The Applicant contends that his discharge was extreme and unjust, that he served his country and shipmates to the best of his ability . When a Sail ’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) , Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance), and Article 113 (Misbehavior of sentinel or lookout) . Violations of UCMJ Article s 112a and 113 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20011219 - 20020606              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20020607              Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050708
Length of Service: 3 Yrs 1 Mths 2 D ys    Lost Time: Days UA: Days Confined:
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 66         Highest Rank/Rate: MA3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0(3)      Behavior: 3.0(3)         OTA: 3.01
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE MEDAL, SHARPSHOOTER PISTOL RIBBON, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20020610:        Medical Record: Applicant evaluated at Recruit Mental Health. On the basis of reported history, interview and assessment data, and behavior observed while at RTC, it has been determined that the Applicant is returned to duty.

20050511:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Referral by ENS P _
         Diagnosis: History of Depression – used Prozac at age 14-15
                  Axis I: Substance induced mood disorder; alcohol abuse/r/o dependence
                  Axis II: deferred
                  Axis III: None
                  Axis IV: PSG, Occupational
         Recommendation: 1. Continue medication (Effexor)
                           2. Sobriety e ncouraged
                           3. Does not require therapy at this time
                           4. Fit for full duty from psychiatric standpoint
                           5. Follow-up in 4-6 weeks

20050621:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 – Absent without Leave , Art. 112a – Wrongful Use, Pos session of Controlled Substance, Art. 113 – Misbehavior of Sentinel or Lookout
         Awarded - FOP ($ 1/2 month ) for ( 2 months); RIR (E-3); Restr for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days).

20050623:        Medical record: Chief complaint – depressed. Applicant stated that he would like to see a counselor regarding his current situation where he is unable to combine his current medication (Effexor) with marijuana, which relieves his depression.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20050605
Reason for Discharge:    -
         -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20050605
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for discharge directed:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050708

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:     Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective
26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Articles 112a and 113.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900536

Original file (MD0900536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, there is no law or regulation, which provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. However, the Applicant is advised completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct warrants clemency. The Board determined the characterization...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600968

Original file (ND0600968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040123: NMCP Initial Psychiatric Evaluation: Applicant reported since being on the ship he has been depressed. Issue 1: (Equity).The Applicant claims his discharge was for mental health issues and not related to any misconduct.When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Additionally, the NDRB does not...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900629

Original file (ND0900629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19980820 - 19990215Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990216Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20001130Highest Rank/Rate:ADAALength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)15 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 34EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801384

Original file (MD0801384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801923

Original file (ND0801923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant contends his discharge,based on a pattern of misconduct, was caused by his inability to arrive at work in a timely manner due to a lack of proper transportation for a period of time. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200948

Original file (MD1200948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, while inservice, he received punishment at two separate NJPs for making false official statements, larceny, misbehavior of a sentinel, and wrongful use of controlled substances. Additionally, support is available by phone at: 1-877-222-VETS (8387).Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the punitive discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900370

Original file (ND0900370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Discharged while mentally ill and never received treatment or screening for bipolar disorder with psychotic features. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300591

Original file (ND1300591.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900090

Original file (ND0900090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.To warrant an upgrade the Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing. The Board determined the characterization of service...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201691

Original file (ND1201691.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700524

Similar Decisions