Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700518

Original file (ND0700518.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-YN3, USN
ND07-00518

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070313 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630650

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change:

Applicant’s Issues:       1. Did not commit the misconduct which resulted in discharge.


Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL .

Date: 20 071115   Location: Washington D.C        R epresentation : Disabled american veterans

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ): In the Applicant’s letter to the Board he states that h e is not guilty of the misconduct w hich result ed in his discharge . T he Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (from the Applicant’s summary of s ervice, service record e ntries, m edical record e ntries, e lements of d ischarge, and evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his claim. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produ ced any evidence, to support his contention . The Applicant requested discharge to escape trial by court-martial. In the request the Applicant noted that his rights were thoroughly explained to him and that he had consult ed counsel. Furthermore, the Applicant admitted guilt to the charge preferred against h im, violation of UCMJ Article 125 ( sodomy ). He further certified a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions and that characterization of service could be under other than honorable conditions.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, m edical and s ervice r ecord e ntries, d ischarge p rocess and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19920730 - 19930711              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19930712               Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 19970228
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 07 Mths 17 D ys                                     Lost Time :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 55          Highest Rank /Rate : YN3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 4.0 ( 3 )       Behavior: 4.0 ( 3 )                  OTA: 4.00 (3)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GCM, N&MCOSR (3), NDSM, NAM, JMUA , MUC, USCG SPECIAL OPS RIBBON, PRES UNIT CIT, NUC, USCG MUC, HSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

199611 0 7 :        U.S. Naval Criminal Investigative Service Report.

Discharge Process

Charge s Preferred: 19961212
Charge s and Specifications:
         Article 121 (2 specs) : (1) Steal ten pounds sterling, (2) Steal an automatic teller machine card.
         Article 125 : Commit sodomy.

Date Applicant Submitted SILT request:            19961227
         Consulted with or Waived Counsel:                 CONSULTED
         Acknowledged Understanding Elements:
         A cknowledged Guilt to:                     Article s 125
                  BCD/DD authorized for offense(s)         121 AND 125
         Acknowledged Consequences of OTH:
         Type of Characterization Requested:

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19970117 )
Separation Authority (date):                       CHNAVPERS ( 19970214 )
         Reason for Discharge directed:
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged :                         19970228

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 11 December 1997,
Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation s of the UCMJ, Article s 121 and 125 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801927

Original file (ND0801927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701246

Original file (ND0701246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

SPCM: Charges preferred violation of UCMJ Article 86 (unauthorized absence, 121 days) and 92 (failure to obey), resulted in request for separation in lieu of trial by courts martial. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 86, 90, and 92. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300215

Original file (ND1300215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

With three NJPs and a retention warning during two years and three months of service, the Applicant met the requirements for administrative separation for a Pattern of Misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800571

Original file (ND0800571.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of all available evidence to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801596

Original file (ND0801596.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board acknowledges the misconduct from the Applicant’s represents a significant departure from the conduct expected of a Sailor and the awarded characterization was appropriate; an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901305

Original file (ND0901305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010427Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040610Highest Rank/Rate:ACANLength of Service: Active Year(s)Month(s) 20 Day(s) Inactive: Year(s)Month(s) 24 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 66EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.0(1)OTA: 3.00Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800075

Original file (ND0800075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701081

Original file (ND0701081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service. 20030221: Applicant discharged. Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20030214 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Separation Authority (date): Commanding Officer, Navy Recruiting District Indianapolis...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100197

Original file (ND1100197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701241

Original file (ND0701241.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700518

Similar Decisions