Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700517
Original file (ND0700517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
, ex-AA, USN
ND07-00517
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070315   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630600

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues: 1. Veterans Benefits
2. Youth and Immaturity
3 . Post service - Equity

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 07111 5    Location: Washington D.C R epresentation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ) : The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his immaturity . While he may feel that t his was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member ’ s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member ’ s military record. T he Applicant ’ s service was marred by, one nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) of Article 85 ( D esertion) and Article 90 (Assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer) . Violation of UCMJ Articles 85 and 90 are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 ( ) : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge . However, there is no law or regulation , which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided his statement of post service accomplishments. The Applicant ’ s efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable employment record, documentation of educational pursuits, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board found that the Applicant ’ s undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that




Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19940613 - 19940905              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19940906               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19960625
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 08 Mths 13 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: 38 Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 39          Highest Rank /Rate : AN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.7 ( 2 )       Behavior: 3.7 ( 2 )                   OTA: 3.7
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, NER (2), SASM, Expert Rifle M14, AFSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19960401:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 1430 on 19960401.

19960501:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1335 on 19960501 (31 days/surrendered).
19960501 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 85 – Desertion, viol UCMJ Art. 90 – Assaulting or willfully disobeying superior commissioned officer .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 490.35 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days) .
19960517:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 1800 on 19960517.

19960524:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1600 on 19960524 (7 days/surrendered).
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       19960516
Reason for Discharge:     -
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19960529
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19960531 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS WASHINGTON DC ( 19960619 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19960625

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 8 5 , desertion and 90, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001618

    Original file (ND1001618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19960524 - 19960625Active: 19960626-19981020 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19981021Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment:2 YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19990301Highest Rank/Rate: ANLength of Service: YearMonths09 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 32EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601170

    Original file (ND0601170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. 19960305: BUPERS directed USS FIFE to reprocess Applicant for administrative separation for misconduct due to drug abuse using administrative board procedures. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000482

    Original file (ND1000482.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decisional issues: (Clemency) The Applicant seeks clemency in the form of an upgrade in the characterization of his service at discharge to General (Under Honorable Conditions) due to extenuating and mitigating facts of his case. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, the verbatim transcript record of trial by Special Court-Martial, and the discharge process, the Board found that Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801186

    Original file (ND0801186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, taking into consideration the Applicant’s testimony, testimony of his brother, service record, offenses committed, length of service,and post-service conduct the Board voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of service to General (Under Honorable Conditions), but the narrative reason shall remain Pattern of Misconduct.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001637

    Original file (ND1001637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .Since fifteen years have elapsed since the date of his discharge, the Applicant is not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100988

    Original file (ND1100988.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The desire for better employment and a better life, by itself, is not a sufficient reason for the Board to upgrade a discharge.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002262

    Original file (ND1002262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of making a former service member eligible to receive educational, medical, or any other veterans benefits. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700096

    Original file (MD0700096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701052

    Original file (MD0701052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by a five discharge warnings and four nonjudicial punishments for violations of UCMJ Article(s) 86 and 92. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700151

    Original file (ND0700151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred byone nonjudicial punishment for violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 [Unauthorized Absence (two specifications)], Article 91 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 134 (Alter public Record).Additionally, the record reflects the Applicant violated the UCMJ, Article 86 [Unauthorized...