Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700254

Original file (ND0700254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-HTFN, USN
ND07-00254

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20061220 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-142

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Reenlistment.
                           2. One single incident in 30 months of service, treated to harshly.
                           3. Post service conduct.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 070927                            Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): The Applicant stated that his discharge was based on one isolated incident and inequitable because his punishment was too harsh. Despite a servicem ember’s prior record of service certain serious offenses warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment for violations of UCMJ Article 92 ( failure to obey ) and Article 1 34 ( indecent language ) . V iolation s of Articles 92 are considered the commission of a serious offense ( the misconduct for whi ch the Applicant was discharged) and are punishable by a maximum penalty of a dishonorable discharge and 2 year s of imprisonment. T he separation code indicates that the Applicant waived h is right to an administrative board and the discharge authority directed the Applicant’s discharge after ensuring com pliance with MILPERSMAN 1910-142 . Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Based upon the record, nothing indicates that the Applicant’s discharge was in any way inconsistent with the standards of discipline in the United States Navy.

Issue 3 ( ): The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge . However , there is no law or regulation which provide s that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded base d solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the servi ce. Normally to permit relief a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. O utstanding post-service conduct to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. In t he Applicant ’s statement he contends that he is now married, a responsible parent and has changed his views on life . The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, evidence of drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in his characterization of service .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence ( to include evidence submitted by the Applicant ) to rebut the presumption. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20010305 - 20010319              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20010320      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20030916
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 05 Mths 27 D ys                            Lost Time :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 47          Highest Rank /Rate : HT3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 2.3                  Behavior: 2.2     OTA: 2.23 (5)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, BATTLE 'E' RIBBON (2), NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20030726:        CO's NJP - Viol UCMJ Art. 92 (failure to obey) ; V iol UCMJ Art. 134 (i ndecent language ) . Awarded - FOP ($721.00 for 2months); RIR (E-4); Restr (45 days); Extra duties (45 days).

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge:

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for discharge directed: NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20030916

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605], SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902150

Original file (ND0902150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400742

Original file (MD1400742.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the Applicant did not submit any documentation, nor is there anything in his records, to warrant clemency. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000140

Original file (ND1000140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Despite a Service Member’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain good order and discipline. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700213

Original file (ND0700213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Request Narrative Code Change 5. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20060203 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NAVY ELEMENT COMMANDER, JOINT INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE SOUTH (20060206)Reason for discharge directed: MISCONDUCT COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901519

Original file (ND0901519.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101946

Original file (ND1101946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After careful consideration of the available records, documentary evidence submitted by the Applicant, and extensive testimony during the personal hearing, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s administrative separation from the Navy on the basis of Personality Disorder was proper. Partial relief warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, the administrative separation discharge process,...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701246

Original file (ND0701246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

SPCM: Charges preferred violation of UCMJ Article 86 (unauthorized absence, 121 days) and 92 (failure to obey), resulted in request for separation in lieu of trial by courts martial. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 86, 90, and 92. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800122

Original file (ND0800122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700398

Original file (ND0700398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ MISCONDUCT ” “ 22MAY2001-10JUN2001” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700954

Original file (ND0700954.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Awarded – FOP,,,and Retention Warning: 20051012 Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700254

Similar Decisions