Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700251
Original file (ND0700251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AA, USN
ND07-00251
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061102   Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Employment Opportunities
                           2. VA Benefits
                           3. Personal problems during service

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 070927 Location:         Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issues 1 - 2 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 3: ( ). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant contends that his personal problems were attributed to his family issues . While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of the misconduct, the record clearly reflects willful misconduct and demonstrated being unfit for further service. The Applicant’s service was the award of one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) ,Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance) and Article 128 (Assault) V iolation of UCMJ Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to General (Under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate.


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20020622 - 20021001              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20021002      Years Contracted : ; Extension:                   Date of Discharge: 20041004
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 00 Mths 03 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 41          Highest Rank /Rate : AN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )       Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )          OTA: 3.33
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20021002:        Enlists. Only living child

20040911:        Positive on urine sample (Admin Sep Recommendation dtd 29 Sep 2004)
20040914:        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of a controlled substance; viol UCMJ Art. 128 (2 specs) - Assault. Awarded - FOP ($693.00) for (2months); RIR (E-2paygrade); Restr for (45days); Extra duties (45days).
20040915:        Applicant declined to be screened and treated for drug dependency.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20040915
Reason for Discharge:     -
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20040916
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20040929 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMCARSTRKGRU THREE ( 20041001 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20041004



Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700230

    Original file (ND0700230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that Discussion Issue1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred one retention warning, three nonjuducial punishments (NJP) for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700168

    Original file (MD0700168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20030808 - 20030824 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030825Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20041006 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 01Mths11 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 53MOS:5900Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.2(1)/4.2(1) Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, RIFLE EXPERT BADGE Medical/Service Record...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700138

    Original file (ND0700138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20021002 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701072

    Original file (ND0701072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date: 20080117Location:Washington D.C Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning, self admission to using drugs on more than one occasion,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700201

    Original file (ND0700201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAVAL FORCE, JAPAN (20051207) Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20051222 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: If a former...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700196

    Original file (ND0700196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by one nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violation of Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance) of the UCMJ. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20010328 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20010329) Separation Authority (date): CHIEF OF NAVAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING (20010329)Reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700200

    Original file (ND0700200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19930803 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930811) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19930817)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700133

    Original file (ND0700133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    86 – [Unauthorized absence (2 specs)]; Viol of UCMJ Art 107 – (False official statement). ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700210

    Original file (ND0700210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMC (DEP)19960913 - 19961020Active: USMC19961021 - 19961125Inactive: NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000622Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20011230 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 06Mths09 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700212

    Original file (ND0700212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found no evidence that the Applicant’s discharge was fair.When a Sailor’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable...