Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700161
Original file (ND0700161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-FR, USN
ND07-00161
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061117   Characterization Received: (ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION)
Narrative Reason: ERRONEOUS ENTRY - DRUG ABUSE Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-130

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Change Ree n listment code
                           2. Inequitable characterization

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall ERRONEOUS ENTRY - DRUG ABUSE .

Date: 20 0709 12      Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 : ( ). The Applicant implies he tested positive for marijuana as a result of misguidance by his recruiter. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the recruiter misled him through the recruitment process. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. However, if the Applicant could demonstrate clear misrepresentations in the recruitment process, such misrepresentations would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s omission of fact that on 20011105 the Applicant certified, o n his United States Navy Illicit Behavior Screening Certificate , that he had not used illegal drugs during the time period of 20010810 to 20011105.

The Applicant should be aware that, by regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumst ances during his less than 1 month of military service to warrant a change of his discharge to general (under honorable conditions) . Therefore the Board found his uncharacterized characterization appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20010810 - 2001104               Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20011105               Years Contracted :        Date of Discharge: 20011126
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 00 Mths 22 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 42          Highest Rank /Rate : FR
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A     OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20010810:        Applicant admits to experimental/casual use of marijuana.

20011105:        Applicant certifies he has not used illegal drugs during the time period of 20010810 to 20011105 .

20011108 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL , reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20011106 , tested positive for THC .
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20011119
Reason for Discharge:     - ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20011119
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):       
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING OFFICER ( 20011120 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  - ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT
Characterization directed:      ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION
Date Applicant Discharged:       20011126

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 13 Jun e 2001 until 21 Aug ust 2002, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800941

    Original file (MD0800941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Susp - None.SCMs: SPCMs: 1 20011012: Article 112a (Wrongful use of marijuana), Article 134 (Breaking restriction), 2 specifications.Sentence - BCD, 60 days confinement, FOP ($650 for 4 months).CC:6105 Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700398

    Original file (ND0700398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ MISCONDUCT ” “ 22MAY2001-10JUN2001” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201430

    Original file (MD1201430.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400169

    Original file (ND1400169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700375

    Original file (ND0700375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB believes that erroneous enlistment best describes the narrative reason for discharge based upon the description that the action would not have occurred had the relevant facts been known by the Navy or had appropriate directives been followed. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700877

    Original file (ND0700877.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Upon review of the facts and applicable regulations, the Board found that an error of procedure occurred and that the Applicant should have been processed for separation for the reason of erroneous enlistment. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900659

    Original file (ND0900659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB advises the Applicant that, with respect to non-service related administrative matters, i.e. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800421

    Original file (ND0800421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recruiter misrepresentations Decision Date: 20080327Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE, DRUG ABUSE.Discussion : which the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Additionally, with respect to non-service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700924

    Original file (ND0700924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 19980409 - 20011119 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Discharge Process Date Notified: 20030522Reason for Discharge:Least Favorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701117

    Original file (MD0701117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the Applicant’s post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries,...