Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700154

Original file (ND0700154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FA, USNR
ND07-00154

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20061114 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Applicant’s Issues:       1. Veterans Benefits – Equity
                           2. Post Service – Equity

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 070912                            Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue(s) 1 - either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 (Equity) : The Applicant submitted 4 undated, handwritten character reference letters in support of his case. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant ’ s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R          19970116 - 19970908              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19970909               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19990913
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 00 Mths 05 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 44          Highest Rank /Rate : FN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A     OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NAVY "E" RIBBON

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19990514 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey a lawful order . Awarded - RIR ( E-2 ) suspended for 60 days ; Restr iction for (45 days); Extra duties ( 45 ays) .

19990729 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of marijuana . Awarded - FOP ( $537.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr iction for ( 45 ays); Extra duties ( 45d ays) , and recommended for admin separation.

19990831:        The remainder of 45 days restriction and 45 days extra duty awarded FA W_ at Captain’s Mast 19990729 is suspended this date for 60 days.

19990908:        Diagnosed as Alcohol dependent by a clinical psychologist. Applicant declined the opportunity to participate in Alcohol Rehabilitation Treatment.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for Discharge:     -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Reason for discharge directed:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19990913

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 24, effective 20 May 99 until 26 March 2000, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order) and 112a (Wrongful use of marijuana.)

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700133

Original file (ND0700133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

86 – [Unauthorized absence (2 specs)]; Viol of UCMJ Art 107 – (False official statement). ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700126

Original file (ND0700126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): due to PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT AND COMMISION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE (20040713) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET (20040804)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20040804 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700115

Original file (ND0700115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant did not provide sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700192

Original file (MD0700192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant claims his medical issues contributed to his misconduct and adverse discharge. (2) Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20051109 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 and 112a BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700142

Original file (MD0700142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000405 - 20000827 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000828Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20030103 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 04Mths06 DysLost Time: 10 Days UA: 9Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 53MOS:3531Highest Rank:Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): N/A/N/A Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL Medical/Service Record Entries Related to...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700755

Original file (ND0700755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Discharge...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700182

Original file (ND0700182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

112a (4 specs) - (1) Wrongfully possess methamphetamine, (2) Wrongfully distribute methamphetamine, (3) Wrongfully possess marijuana, (4) Wrongfully distribute marijuana.Awarded - FOP ($427.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-1); Restriction for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days) Discharge Process Date Notified: 19950907Reason for Discharge:- Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19950907Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700861

Original file (ND0700861.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990520 - 19990728Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990729Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20020905Length of Service: 03Yrs 01Mths07 DysLost Time:unable to accurately...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700394

Original file (ND0700394.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ 02JAN2000-04JAN2000 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Awarded - Restr for...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700153

Original file (ND0700153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Separation: BY 3-0 VOTE, Recommendation on Characterization: BY 3-0 VOTE,Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20041130) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, 3D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP (20050316)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050418 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700154

Similar Decisions