Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700107
Original file (ND0700107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
                  DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR
ex-EN2, USN
ND07-00107
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061025            Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT                                         Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-144

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Did not commit misconduct.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 071002                                              Location: Washington D.C.       

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ). The government is entitled to a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant’s denial of culpability is not, in itself, sufficient to overcome that presumption. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that the dis charge was proper and equitable, and that the Applicant had not submitted sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption of regularity.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 99JUN16 TO 03JUN0 1 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      19980813 - 19990615              Active:          19990616 - 20030601
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20030602               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050711
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 01 Mths 09 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 31          Highest Rank /Rate : EN2
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.5 ( 2 )       Behavior: 3.0 ( 2 )                   OTA: 3.28
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, ENLISTED SURFACE WARFARE SPECIALIST, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2)

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20030602:        Reenlisted this date for a term of 3 years.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  NOT FOUND IN RECOR D
Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):       
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050711

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Letter from Senator C_ L_

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 29 April 2005 until 27 July 2005, Article 1910-144, Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Civilian Conviction.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000724

    Original file (ND1000724.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701045

    Original file (ND0701045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that the Applicant was the subject of an Administrative Board that recommended a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service for homosexual acts, and, an other than honorable characterization of service for commission of a civilian conviction. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700694

    Original file (ND0700694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service Record2. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by the award of one retention warning, a civilian conviction for DUI, and one nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 78 (Accessory after the fact), Article 92 (Dereliction in the performance of duties), and Article 134 (Fleeing the scene of an accident). ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701077

    Original file (ND0701077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19980127 - 19980204 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980205Years Contracted:4; Extension: 16 Months (EAOS 20030604)Date of Discharge: 20030602Length of Service: 05 Yrs 03Mths24 Dys Lost Time: 03...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800508

    Original file (ND0800508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902184

    Original file (ND0902184.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601222

    Original file (MD0601222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3: (Equity) The Board determined the Applicant was involuntarily discharged based on a medical prognosis that the Applicant’s condition would unlikely change if retained. SEPARATION (20050701) SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT, SAN DIEGO CA 92140-5000 (20050707)Narrative Reason directed: DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT DUE TO FRAUDULENT ENTRYCharacterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050711 Additional Documents Considered...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001860

    Original file (ND1001860.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to become a police officer.2. Based on the offense committed by the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700135

    Original file (ND0700135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be administratively discharged via MILPERSMAN 1910-152 (alcohol rehabilitation failure) a member must first attend an intensive alcohol treatment program and subsequently be involved in a serious alcohol incident or violate his aftercare treatment plan. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20030602 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800346

    Original file (ND0800346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...