Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700077

Original file (ND0700077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-IT3, USN
ND07-00077

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:                               20 061026
         Characterization of Service:
         Reason for Discharge :                      IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL
         Discharge Authority :                       MILPERSMAN 1910-106
         Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:    TPU NAVSTA NORVA 23511

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:               /General (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
         Representation:
         Issues (as summarized by NDRB):          1. VA benefits
                                                      2. Subject of and witness to hazing.


Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL .

Date of Decision:                                            20 070830
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:
Complete Medical Record:
Complete Discharge Package:

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): In the Applicant’s letter to the Board he states that his misconduct was the result of being subject to and the witness of hazing . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his claim. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support his contention of hazing . E ven if the Applicant could document his claims this would neither amount to a justification nor to a defense for the Applicant’s own misconduct. The record clearly reflects his willful and continued misconduct which demonstrated he was unfit for further service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USA (DEP)                                 19991202 – 20000628 COG - Failed to ship.
Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                20000731 - 20000801
Active:

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20000801
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20050714
Length of Service
         Active:                                     04 Yrs 11 Mths 1 4 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)
         Time Lost During This Period:             88 Days UA:

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 50
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   IT3

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
                                                      Performance : 2.5 Behavior : 2.8 OTA : 2.96(4)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE RIBBON, LETTER OF COMMENDATION, GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

20040630 :        NJP for violation of UCMJ:
         Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30 days.

20050324:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0730 on 20050324.

20050325:        Applicant missed movement of USS KAUFMAN (FFG 59).

20050331:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1530 on 20050331 (7 days/surrendered).

20050408:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0730 on 20050408.

20050606:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 2000 on 20050606 (58 days/surrendered).

20050620:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0730 on 20050620.

20050622:        Commanding Officer, Transient Personnel Unit, Norfolk to Officer in Charge, Personnel Support Activity Detachment, Naval Station Norfolk requesting applicant be discharge in absentia.

20050713:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0730 on 20050713 (23 days/surrendered).

20050714:        Applicant discharged .

Elements of Discharge: [SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL]

Date Charge(s) Preferred:                                   20050609
Charge s and Specifications:                         Article 86 : (3 specs), Unauthorized absence

Date Applicant Submitted SILT request:            20050613
         Consulted with or Waived Counsel:                 Waived
         Acknowledged Understanding Elements:
         Acknowledged Guilt to:                     Charges preferred - Article 86 (unauthorized absence)
                  BCD/DD authorized for offense(s)         YES
         Acknowledged Consequences of OTH:
         Type of Characterization Requested:

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):
Separation Authority (date):                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
         Reason for Discharge directed:
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged :                         20050714

Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Total Number of Pages:                               48

Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         From Service and/or Medical Record :                Other Records :

Related to Other Period (s) of Service:
         From Service and/or Medical Record:               Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                                           Finances:
         Health/Medical Records:                            Substance Abuse:
         Family/Personal Status:                            Education:
        Community Service Efforts:                         References:
         Criminal Records:

Other:
         Additional Statements From Applicant :             From Representative:
        Other Documentation (Describe)             Certificate of Live Birth, High School Diploma, letter from Applicant’s Father

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 31 May 2005 and Present, Article 1910-106, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (unauthorized absence, in excess of 30 days) .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700214

Original file (ND0700214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by four nonjudicial punishments and two retention warning for violations of UCMJ Articles 86 (unauthorized absence, 6 specifications), 87 (missing movement), 90 (willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer), 91 (insubordinate conduct, 2 specifications), 92 (failure to obey, 3 specifications), 107 (false official statements), 111 (drunk operation of a motor vehicle), 112 (drunk on watch), and 134 (disorderly conduct and communicating a threat). ...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301148

Original file (MD1301148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, the Applicant continued to commit violations of the UCMJ and received four counseling warnings for failure to maintain Marine Corps weight standards, for failure to provide financial support to his wife and child, for wearing earrings in violation of Marine Corps orders, and for three violations of Article 86 (Absence without leave). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500282

Original file (ND0500282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.116 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500309

Original file (MD0500309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION “We ask that after your review of the evidence and the Applicants issues that you change the discharge as requested.” There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1501052

Original file (MD1501052.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s misconduct charges were brought against him by the perpetrators of the hazing events which resulted in his assignment to PSD-16 for processing for administrative separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500717

Original file (ND0500717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 040324: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0750 (44 days/surrendered).040329: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (Absent without leave)
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902483

Original file (MD0902483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, post-service character references, and the discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700573

Original file (MD0700573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20041015 - 20050227 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20050228Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050815Length of Service: 0 Yrs 5Mths15 DysLost Time:Days UA: 56 Days Confined: Education Level:...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900101

Original file (ND0900101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board rejects the Applicant’s claim he did not have formal training on hazing as being without merit and insufficient to warrant an upgrade. Issue 4:() .The Applicant contends his post service conduct warrants an upgrade. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved and based on the limited post-service documentation provided...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700724

Original file (ND0700724.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20020226 - 20030624 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030624 Years Contracted: ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20050712 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 00 Mths 19 Dys Lost Time: Days UA: 430 Days...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700077

Similar Decisions