Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701094
Original file (MD0701094.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070801
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN (Drug Abuse)

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19990628 - 19990629              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19990630               Period of enlistment : Years Months             Date of Discharge: 20020510
Length of Service: Yrs Mths 11 D ys     Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 63
MOS: 3432                 Highest Rank:            Fitness reports:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      ( )/ ( )
Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle , , CERTCOM, LtrApr

 Periods of UA/CONF:

NJPs:   
         20010910 : Art(s) 112a (Drug use). Awarded - , , (45 days) (45 days) Susp - (15 days (15 days)
        
6105 Counseling:

NDRB Documentary Review, Case # MD03-01061, conducted 20040408: Proper and equitable, no change warranted.
        
Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representation:              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe) Resume
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Alcohol Dependency mitigates conduct.
2. Post Service.

Decision

Date: 2008             Date: 20080508 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation : American Legion

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Discussion

Issue 1 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with discipline standards of the Naval service.

When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general (under honorable conditions) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record.

There is credible evidence in the record the Applicant committed misconduct which the Naval service considers a serious violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ); the Applicant does not deny this misconduct. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that his professed dependency on alcohol justified or excused his actions. The Applicant’s conduct during the period of service under review, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, was marred by one non-judicial punishment for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (Use of Illegal Drugs). The Applicant could have received an under other than honorable conditions discharge or a punitive discharge and up to two years imprisonment if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial: instead, the command issued the Applicant a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge in light of his service record.

Issue 2 (Equity). There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian sector subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.

The Board found the Applicant had submitted credible evidence indicative of good post-service conduct and commends the Applicant’s apparent rehabilitative success to date. However, after a complete review of the entire record, including the testimony presented by the Applicant, the Board determined the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature of the Applicant’s misconduct and did not deviate from the standards of discipline applied to other service members under similar circumstances. The Board also determined the evidence of post-service conduct, while outstanding in content, was not sufficient to convince the Board an upgrade to Honorable was appropriate. After hearing the Applicant’s testimony, the Board determined a change in the characterization of service was unwarranted.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s testimony, Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.

















































ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201662

    Original file (ND1201662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of controlled substances, to wit: marijuana) Awarded: Suspended: SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200222

    Original file (ND1200222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100452

    Original file (ND1100452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of the discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800858

    Original file (ND0800858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19981110 - 19981129Active: USMC 19970325-19970404 ELS Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19981130Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20010622Length of Service: Years Months23 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 53Highest Rank/Rate:PR3EvaluationMarks:Performance: 3.3(3) Behavior:2.3(3)OTA: 2.92Awards and Decorations (per...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801513

    Original file (ND0801513.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the Board applauds the Applicant’s post service efforts, the Board determined the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient enough to warrant an upgrade.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Dissenting Opinion:The Applicant was administratively discharged based on misconduct due to drug abuse and given a characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200111

    Original file (ND1200111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant requests that his monetary recoupment for his Naval Academy education be waived or mitigated.2. After a review of the Applicant’s service, cooperation with NCIS, misconduct that he admitted to, and recommendations from the chain of command, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) assigned a General (Under Honorable Conditions)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801746

    Original file (ND0801746.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s counsel requested an upgrade in the characterization of the Applicant’s service to Honorable and the narrative reason changed to convenience of the government based on the contention that the Applicant’s misconduct as discussed supra, is mitigated by his diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and post-service conduct. After a thorough review of the his official service records, his post-service documentation regarding his PTSD, post-service accomplishments and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000212

    Original file (ND1000212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. By majority rule, the NDRB voted to upgrade the discharge characterization to General (Under Honorable Conditions), but voted unanimously not to change the narrative reason for separation.Summary: After a thorough review of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101257

    Original file (ND1101257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: UNCHARACTERIZED Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20070224 - 20070416Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070417Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100322Highest Rank/Rate:BM3Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 60EvaluationMarks:Performance:5.0(2)Behavior:4.5(2)OTA: 4.36Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900008

    Original file (MD0900008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...