Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700999
Original file (MD0700999.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00999
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070710   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT     Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.6

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to: ( see discussion in Issue 3, below )
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Re-Code/re-enlistment
                           2. Post-service conduct

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 080110             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ). The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety or inequity after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

Issue 3 ( ). By regulation, when an Applicant does not indicate a specific change to his or her characterization of service, the Board reviews the case as if the request was for a change to an honorable characterization of service. The Applicant, however, explicitly inidicated that he was not requesting any change to his characterization of service. In spite of that request, the Board did review the Applicant’s characterization of service and determined that it was equitable in light of the misconduct upon which it was based.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20031017 - 20040314              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20040315                                 Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 20050314
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 00 Mths 00 D ys                            Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 41          MOS: 9971 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      NOT FOUND IN RECORD
 Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , NDSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20040923:        To unauthorized absence.

20041117:        From unauthorized absence (55 days/apprehended).

 20041210 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 - Unauthorized absence 20040923 - 20041117 .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 596.00 ) for ( 2 months) , susp 6 months ; RIR (E-1); Restr for ( 60 days) .

20041210 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violation of Art. 86.

20050110:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for physical condition (partial right knee anterior cruciate ligament tear) which interferes with performance of duties.

20050118:         Medical Record: SMART Center recommendation.
         Diagnosis: Partial right knee anterior cruciate ligament tear . Exhausted conservative care.
         Recommendation: Administrative separation.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20050214
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO
         DUE TO CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20050228
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050228 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20050310 )
Separation Authority (date):     C G , MARINE CORPS BASES, CAMP PENDL E TON CA ( 20050311 )
 Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050314

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:             Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F ) , effective 1 Sep tember 2001 until Present,
Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C . The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 , Absence without leave (for more than 30 days) .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200143

    Original file (ND1200143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700496

    Original file (ND0700496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable due to inconsistencies in documentation of his alcohol dependency.The service records that the Board reviewed indicate the following: 1) The Applicant went to NJP 20041014 for drunk and disorderly conduct in Guam and damage to government property, 2) completed Alcohol Impact 20041104, 3) was diagnosed as alcohol dependent by a psychologist 20050222, 4) went to NJP on 20050224 for drunk and disorderlyconduct and assault on a commissioned...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900567

    Original file (MD0900567.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400508

    Original file (ND1400508.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900218

    Original file (ND0900218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20010516 - 20010828 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010829Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Extension Date of Discharge: 20060405Highest Rank/Rate: FNLength of Service: Years Months 07 Days Education Level: AFQT: 37Evaluation Marks: Performance: NFIR Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214): (2)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700674

    Original file (ND0700674.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900106

    Original file (ND0900106.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade founded upon the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700774

    Original file (ND0700774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800435

    Original file (ND0800435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge was in error based on post service medical diagnosis Decision Date: 20080328Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700877

    Original file (ND0700877.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Upon review of the facts and applicable regulations, the Board found that an error of procedure occurred and that the Applicant should have been processed for separation for the reason of erroneous enlistment. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...