Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700817
Original file (MD0700817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-PFC, USMCR
MD07-00817
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070523        Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE
Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6213      

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to: MEDICAL
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Diagnosed medical condition made it impossible to serve my contract.
                          

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE IN THE READY RESERVE.

Date: 20 0712 12                   Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1 (Equity). W hen reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. The NDRB generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition, the implied incorrect diagnosis, nor the medical treatment given to the Applicant to be of sufficient nature to exculpate the Applicant’s conduct . In fact, the NDRB sees no connection between the Applicant’s medical condition and his unsatisfactory performance . The Applicant’s unsatisfactory performance began before his medical condition was diagnosed by a civilian doctor. It was not, however, ever diagnosed and recorded by competent military medical authority.

The documentation and statements provided by the Applicant did not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The Applicant’s medical evaluation of 20041110 does not invalidate the missed required drills and lack of communication with the unit. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that


Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19991101 – 20010622      Active: 20010623 – 20010802      HON
                                                               20020402 – 20020423     HON
                                                               20030214 – 20040108     HON
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20010623      Years Contracted : 8 ; Extension:         Date of Discharge: 20051006
Length of Service : 01 Yrs   00 Mths 26 D ys         Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 93          MOS: 3043 Highest Rank: LCPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):        4.2 ( 10 ) / 4.2 ( 10 )
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , AFRM, NDSM, MM, SELECTED MCRM


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19991015:        A pplicant denies any serious medical history on MEPS entrance physical exam.
19991101:        Applicant signs the 6 and 2 year contract with the selected Marine Corps Reserve.

20020908 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for unexcused absences from schedule drills April, May, and June 2002. Discharge warning issued.

20030213:        Ordered to Preside n tial recall from 20030213 to 20040212 (365 days).
20030221:        Applicant signs orders endorsement stating he has not had any injury, illness, disease, or physical defect which would restrict his performance on active duty.

20031210:        Termination of temporary additional duty.
20040711 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for unexcused absences from schedule drills July 2004. Discharge warning issued.

20040808 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for unexcused absences from schedule drills August 2004. Discharge warning issued.

20041003 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for unexcused absences from schedule drills October 2004. Discharge warning issued.

20041025:        Inspector/Instructor letter declaring Applicant an unsatisfactory participant in the ready reserve.

20041110 :        Civilian Medical Record: Treatment from 20040917 – 20041004 and 20041107 – 20041110.
         Diagnosis: Bipo l ar Disorder – Type I .
         Recommendation: Continued outpatient treatment and medication.

20051114:        Applicant states to mental health provider tha t he was diagnosed with Bipolar in September 2004.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20041022
Basis for Discharge:     

Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  RETURNED UNSIGNED
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050821 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20050821 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 4 TH MARINE LOGISTICS GROUP ( 20051006 )
Basis for discharge directed:  
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20051006


Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6213 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700043

    Original file (MD0700043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. NOT FOUND IN...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700096

    Original file (MD0700096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400792

    Original file (MD1400792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00757

    Original file (MD04-00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00915

    Original file (MD01-00915.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that a change be made to the characterization of my discharge due to the fact that I left my unit in the face of injustice. 970606: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. The Board found no evidence of racism against the applicant in a review of his service records.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01381

    Original file (MD03-01381.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 961011: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.961103: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [unsatisfactory participation in reserve, specifically failure to attend regular scheduled drills on 961102 and 961103].

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902294

    Original file (MD0902294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00242

    Original file (MD03-00242.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00242 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030115, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. “ To Whom It May Concern: The reason I am writing this issue is to inform you why I received a “other than honorable discharge” and request an upgrade to an “honorable discharge”. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00548

    Original file (MD01-00548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 for period 901130 to 910429 Copy of DD Form 214 for period 890123 to 890713 Reserve Retirement Credit Rep (NAVMC 798) Meritorious Mast Certificate dtd 22 July 1990 Meritoriously Advancement Certificate to PFC dtd 2 April 1989 10 pages from Military Service Record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00923

    Original file (MD04-00923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00923 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040511. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Not allowed to transfer or perform periods of active duty until recovery is complete.010402: Commanding Officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.010503: Administratively reduced to Private due to unsatisfactory...