Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700770
Original file (MD0700770.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-PFC, USMC
MD0
7-00770

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070515   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT                   Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Discharge inequitable due to diagnosed medical condition.
        
                  2. Treated unfairly by command.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 071115 Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue 1 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed misconduct. The Applicant does not deny this misconduct. However, th e NDRB concluded that the medical evidence of record is supportive of the Applicant’s claim that he was suffering from diagnosed PTSD. The NDRB considered the diagnosed PTSD as a mitigating factor associated with the Applicant’s in service outstanding conduct and the subsequent period of misconduct . The NDRB found that there w as an i nequity in the Applicant’s discharge action and as a result determined that an i nequity in the characterization did occur.

Issue 2 (Equity).
The Applicant implies that he was treated unfairly by his unit. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for discipline or did not support him. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service,
Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19980709 - 19990705       Active: 19990706 - 20020 930
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 200210 01      Years Contracted : 4 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20060331
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 06 Mths 00 D ys         Lost Time : Days UA: 5 Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 21     AFQT: 71         MOS: 2841 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.1 / 3.6       Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NMCCM, AAM, GCM, SSDR x 2, GWOTSM, GWOTEM, AFGHAN I STAN CAMPAIGN MEDAL , NDSM, RIFLE EXPERT BADGE.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20050505 :        Medical Record: Regimental Aid Station. Reason for visit: Chest discomfort about 10 times since return from Iraq.

20050511 :        Medical Record: Regimental Aid Station. Reason for visit: Anxiety. Given valium for anxiety .

20050715 :        Medical Record: Regimental Aid Station. Reason for visit: Anxiety attack. Has had a history of anxiety attacks since return from Iraq. Med include Zoloft and Inderal. PTSD and alcohol dependence and recent suicidal gesture. Ambien for sleep disorder and Zoloft.

20050706 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violations of UCMJ Articles(s) 86, 3 days; 91, insubordination to an NCO; 92, disobeying a lawful order; 134, drunk and disorderly. 11+

20050715 :        Medical Record: Regimental Aid Station. Reason for visit: PTSD and alcohol dependence and recent suicidal gesture. Ambien for sleep disorder and Zoloft.

20050725 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for being drunk on duty while awaiting NJP. Discharge warning issued.

20050726
:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art icle(s) 86, 3 days; 86, 2 days, 91, 92.
         Awarded - FOP ($
978 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-4 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

20050812:        Completed 2 weeks of alcohol education by Camp Pendleton CSACC.

20050912 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for drunk and disorderly conduct. Discharge warning issued.

20050913:       
Screened by Substance Abuse Counselor. Alcohol dependence and has been seen by CAPT Nash and diagnosed with PTSD.

20050913 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art icle 134, disorderly conduct and drunkenness , BAC .275.
         Awarded - RIR (
E-2 ) suspended for 6 months ; Restr for ( 60 days).

20051018 :        Medical Record Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton : Reason for visit: Summary of care from 20050919 – 20051018.
         Diagnosis:
PTSD and alcohol dependence. Continued to use alcohol despite physical and psychological problems as evidenced by blackouts, scrapes, and coping with PTSD.
         Recommendation:
return to duty and be placed in a formal one year recovery program.

20060110 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for established pattern of misconduct. Being recommended for administrative discharge.

20060119
:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art icle(s) 86, failure to go due to being intoxicated and 92, Failure to obey order/regulation. .
         Awarded - FOP ($
715 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

200601 12 :        Medical Record: Mental Health Clinic, Camp Pendleton follow up visit.
         Diagnosis:      
         Recommendation:


20060130 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Discharge physical.
         Diagnosis:
Anxiety disorder, alcohol dependence; symptoms since May 2005.
         Recommendation:
Lexapro and mental heath treatment




Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20060213
Basis for Discharge:
     DUE TO
        
DUE TO ALCOHOL REHAB FAILURE
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:
                 20060213
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      

         Obtain Copies of Documents               

         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
( UNDATED )
         Administrative Board                      


Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20060217 )
SJA review (date):      
( 20060324 )
Separation Authority (date):    
COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST AMRINE DIVISION ( 20060329 )
Basis for discharge directed:  
DUE TO
Characterization directed:     

Date Applicant Discharged:      
     


Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
        
Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:
                  Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:
                  Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:
   From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (s) 91 and 92.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at http://Boards.law.af.mil .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700964

    Original file (MD0700964.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - Restr for (14 days).20060602: Applicant voluntarily waives his right to an Administrative Discharge Board.20060619: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Separation Physical Diagnosis: Fit For Separation. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700238

    Original file (MD0700238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two discharge warnings, one nonjudicial punishment for violating the UCMJ Article(s) 92, Failure to obey order, regulation and 111, Drunken driving, and a guilty finding at Special Court-Martial for Article(s) 86, Unauthorized absence over thirty days and 112a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. After a thorough...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701093

    Original file (MD0701093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. 20050318: Vacate FOP for 1 month, Restr and Extra duties for 45 days awarded at NJP dated 20050116.20050331: MARCORSEPMAN 6105...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700452

    Original file (MD0700452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service Record 5. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19960731 - 19960903Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960904Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20000824 Length of Service: 03 Yrs 11Mths21 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700192

    Original file (MD0700192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant claims his medical issues contributed to his misconduct and adverse discharge. (2) Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20051109 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 and 112a BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700321

    Original file (MD0700321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20040930 - 20050221 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701054

    Original file (MD0701054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20000720 - 20010610 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010611Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20040217Length of Service: 02 Yrs 08 Mths07 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700827

    Original file (MD0700827.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature and seriousness of the Applicant’s misconduct, and that the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient to convince the Board that an upgrade was appropriate at this time.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700629

    Original file (MD0700629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20071120Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700295

    Original file (MD0700295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20011221 - 20020818Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020819Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050201 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 05Mths12 DysLost Time:Days UA: 44 Days Confined: Education...