Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700680

Original file (MD0700680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMC
MD07-00680

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070423 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Record of service.
                           2. Youth, immaturity, and personal problems.
                           3. Command did not follow discharge regulations.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date: 20 071129 Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue 1 and 2 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is c onduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by a finding of guilty at one Summary Court-Martial for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a . A v iolation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). The Applicant implies that he was treated unfairly by his unit. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for discipline or did not follow Marine Corps regulations during the separation processing. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20000815 - 20001023
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20001024               Years Contracted : 4 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20040326
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 05 Mths 03 D ys        Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d : 23
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 44          MOS: 3534 Highest Rank: CPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.5(10 ) / 4.5 ( 10 )
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GCM, NMCAM, SSDR x 2, NDSM, PUC, LOA, MM, RIFLE MARKSMAN BADGE.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20000812:        Applicant signs Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

20000815:        Applicant receives pre-service drug waiver for THC x 4.

20031113 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20031017 , tested positive for THC .

20030218 :        SCM -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a .
         Awarded - FOP ( $892 ) for ( 1 month); RIR ( E-2 ); Confinement ( 30 days).

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20040129
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20040129
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20040123)
SJA review (date):       ( 20040316 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING ( 20040316 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20040326

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F ) , effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700441

Original file (ND0700441.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “CONTINUOUS ACTIVE SERVICE 19960314 TO 20011115 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601045

Original file (MD0601045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20040304Basis for Discharge: MISCONDUCT FOR ILLEGAL DRUG USE Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040304Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901027

Original file (MD0901027.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20090317 Characterization of Service Received: Narrative Reason for Discharge: Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20020612 - 20030608 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030609 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge: 20040326...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700730

Original file (ND0700730.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

Date: 20071205 Location: Washington D.C Representation: Discussion Issue 1 (): When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.” Additional Reviews: Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901412

Original file (MD0901412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT-MARTIAL.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701265

Original file (MD0701265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19951229 - 19960909 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960910Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 20000224Length of Service: 03 Yrs 05 Mths15 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 81MOS: 2141Highest Rank: LCPLProficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.5(9)/ 4.5(9)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):SSDR, AFEM, LOA,...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900723

Original file (ND0900723.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. While the Board applauds the Applicant for taking accountability for his actions, maintaining a steady job, and for being a single parent, the Board determined statements of post-service conduct was not sufficient enough to warrant an upgrade of his discharge characterization. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800565

Original file (MD0800565.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700480

Original file (MD0700480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date:20071101Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Texas Veterans Commission Discussion Issue 1: The Board determined that this issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20031121 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701257

Original file (MD0701257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19921204 - 19921208 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19921209Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 19940520Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05 Mths12 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:20AFQT: 86MOS: 0200Highest Rank: LCPLProficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.5(3) / 4.5(3)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): NDSM, Rifle...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700680

Similar Decisions