Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700206
Original file (MD0700206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00206
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061202   Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE DISCHARGE
Narrative Reason: SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL   Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6419

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. The Applicant opines that his Under Other Than Honorable conditions discharge is too harsh
                           because there were extenuating factors that contributed to his misconduct of record.
                           2. Post service - Equity

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL

Date: 2008012 3               Location: Washington D.C.        Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1 ( ). The Applicant opines that his under other than honorable conditions discharge is too harsh because there were extenuating factors that contributed to his misconduct of record. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Marine ’ s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. Characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant ’ s service was marred by preferred charges for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The Applicant ’ s misconduct included Art. 86 (unauthorized absence), Art. 91 (willfully disobeying a lawful order), Art. 92 (failure to obey a lawful order) and Art. 121 (larceny). (Violation of UCMJ Article s 91, 92 and 121 ) are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. Additionally, on 19911004 the Applicant submitted a request for administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Applicant acknowledged his understanding of his request and admitted being guilty of violating Articles 86, 91, 92 and 121 of the UCMJ. Based on a review of the Applicants record, all procedures were followed and the Applicant was provided counsel. The Applicant ’ s conduct and proficiency markings, which form the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect his misconduct, and fall below that required for an honorable characterization of service.

Issue 2 ( ). There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.



Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19881025 - 19890917              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19890918               Years Contracted :                Date of Discharge: 19911202
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 02 Mths 15 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: 10 Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 94          MOS: 0342 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.0 ( 8 ) / 4.0 ( 8 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): RIFLE EXPERT BADGE, PISTOL EXPERT BADGE, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19910729:        Applicant released for police custody. Court date of 19910826 for possession of stolen goods.
19910815 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Has been noted by family and coworker to be acting differently. Second opinion
          Diagnosis: Schizoid traits
         Recommendation: No major psychiatric illness is evidence. Administratively cleared for any action deemed appropriate by command.

Discharge Process

 Charge(s) Preferred: 19910826
Charge(s) and Specification(s):
          Article 86 : Unauthorized absence from 0601, 19910719 until apprehended on 19910730.
         Article 91 : Willfully disobey a lawful order.
         Article 92: Fail to obey lawful order
         Article 121 (2 specs): (1) Steal one set of Virginia State License plates.
                           (2) Steal one Government decal.
Date Applicant Submitted SILT request:            19911004
         Consulted with or Waived Counsel:                
         Acknowledged Understanding Elements:    
         Acknowledged Guilt to:                     Article(s) 86, 91, 92 and 121
                  BCD/DD authorized for offense(s)        
         Acknowledged Consequences of OTH:       
         Type of Characterization Requested:     

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19911017 )
Separation Authority (date):                       COMMANDING GENERAL, FLEET MARINE FORCE, ATLANTIC ( 19911119 )
          Reason for Discharge directed:           
         Characterization directed:                        
Date Applicant Discharged :                         19911202

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Career Occupational Preference System Summary




Pertinent Regulation/Law

 Pending results of hearing.

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 27 June 19 89 until 1 July 1994 .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m ( 7 ) ( b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (s) 91, 92, and 121.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800459

    Original file (ND0800459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800804

    Original file (MD0800804.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800832

    Original file (MD0800832.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700449

    Original file (ND0700449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Violations of Articles 92 and 128 constitute the “commission of a serious offense”, which forms the basis for discharge in this case. The Applicant was properly processed for separation by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, Article 3630600 (for the period in question) directs that Block 28 contain the phrase “Misconduct – commission of a serious offense” when separating under these conditions.Since no other Narrative Reason...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801771

    Original file (MD0801771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service, including Good Conduct Medal.4. The NDRB determined Applicant’s characterization of service was properly considered by the Administrative Discharge Board and a change would be inappropriate. The Applicant is directed to contact the Veteran’s Administration at 1-888-422-4551and/or the Defense Finance and Accounting Service at 1-800-962-0648 for further information regarding this issue.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700171

    Original file (MD0700171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that Discussion Issue 1: The Board determined that this Issue is not an issue which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19880514 - 19880906 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19880907Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19911230 Length of Service: 3 Yrs 2Mths26 DysLost Time:Days...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800819

    Original file (MD0800819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - ,,Susp - 20050317: Art(s) 121 (Larceny).Awarded - ,,,Susp - 6105 Counseling: 20020826: For Unauthorized absence.20021211: For Unauthorized absence Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800945

    Original file (MD0800945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801141

    Original file (ND0801141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined an upgrade or change would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301372

    Original file (MD1301372.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...