Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700148

Original file (MD0700148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-00148

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20061108 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to: convenience of the government RE-1
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Youth and Immaturity - Equity
                           2. Post service - Equity

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 070912 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ) : The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his youth and immaturity. While he may feel that his youth and immaturity was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate .

Issue 2 ( ) : There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. An upgrade to honorable is inappropriate .

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19980617 - 19990514              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19990615               Years Contracted :                Date of Discharge: 20000217
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 08 Mths 03 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 61          MOS: 9900 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.8 ( 3 ) / 3.8 ( 3 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): RIFLE EXPERT BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19991201 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19991118, tested positive for cocaine.

19991214         MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for illegal usage of a controlled substance cocaine as verified by the NAVDRUGLAB message R 011858Z December 1999.

19991216 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully used cocaine.
         Awarded - - FOP ( $479.00 ) for ( 2 months); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

19991221 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Substance abuse/dependence.
         Diagnosis: Drug abuse, isolated incident. Alcohol dependence.
         Recommendation: Processed for administrative separation. Treatment at the ATF.

199 9 1221:        Applicant acknowledged statement of understanding of treatment for substance abuse at a Veterans Administration Medical Center.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20000120
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20000120
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( UNDATED )
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 2000120 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20000204 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA ( 20000215 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20000217

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Letter from Open Door, Incorporated

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective
31 January 1997 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc… of a controlled substance).

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800825

Original file (MD0800825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a certificate of National Service, , and a witness to corroborate his post-service accomplishments.While the Board acknowledges the Applicant’s community service and his continued pursuit...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200239

Original file (ND1200239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700669

Original file (ND0700669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention of immaturity.The separation code (entered on block 26 of the DD-214) indicates that the Applicant waived his right to an administrative board and was administratively discharged as a result of drug abuse. Summary of Service Prior Service:Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000217Years Contracted:4; Extension: 12Date of Discharge: 20010302Length of Service: 01 Yrs...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700194

Original file (MD0700194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board found that Discussion Issue(s)1-2: The Board determined that these Issue(s) are not issue(s) which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101436

Original file (ND1101436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to reenlist into the Armed Forces. Relief denied.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service and record entries, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200371

Original file (ND1200371.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to improve his employment opportunities. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101921

Original file (MD1101921.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901071

Original file (MD0901071.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant acknowledged his complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 12 November 2006. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, discharge process and statement submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801786

Original file (MD0801786.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the Applicant’s alcohol dependency did not mitigate his misconduct, but did determine an upgrade to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” was appropriateand warranted. Thus, an upgrade to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” would also be warranted due to his post-service efforts.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM:...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400397

Original file (ND1400397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

of controlled substances, cocaine) Awarded: Suspended: SCM:SPCM:CC:Retention Warning Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700148

Similar Decisions