Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601099
Original file (ND0601099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ENFN, USN
ND06-01099

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060815      
Reason for Separation:                              MISCONDUCT -
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MILPERSMAN 1910-140
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       USS CROMMELIN (FFG 37), AT PEARL HARBOR, HI

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:                NONE REQUESTED
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
         Representation:                                    


Issues (as summarized by NDRB):

 1. Enhance employment and education opportunities
2. Previously punished for same reason discharged
3. Discharge not warranted by overall service record    

Decision:

 Date of Decision:                                            20070719
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package:                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        

By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY .

Summary of Service :

Prior Service:   Inactive :         USNR                        19950908 - 199 50925
                  Active:          USNR                        199509 26 - 19990729 HON
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 199 90730 *      
Years Contracted :                                  
Date of Discharge:                                  20000301      
Length of Service
         Active:                                      00 Yrs 07 Mths 02 D ys (does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive:                                            00 Yrs 00 Mths 00 D ys
         Time Lost During This Period:             Days UA: Days Confinement:

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 50
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   ENFN

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL (2), MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, NATIONAL DEFENSE DESERT STORM SERVICE MEDAL (DESERT SHIELD), SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2)

*Extracted from Commanding Officer, USS CROMMELIN ltr dtd 20000216
Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20000216 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 92: Failure to obey lawful order.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 613 .00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days (suspended for 6 months) , reduction to E- 3 .
          No indication of appeal in the record.

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation
None.

Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                  ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDURE
Date Notified :                                        20000216
Reason for Discharge                               
Least Favorable Characterization:                         

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20000216
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s) (date)                               
GCMCA Review                               

Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     NOT APPLICABLE (LOCAL SEPARATION) *
Discharge directed by (date):     COMMANDING OFFICER, USS CROMMELIN (FFG 37) (20000216)
Narrative reason directed :                                   MISCONDUCT -
Characterization directed:      
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20000301

*NDRB note: COMNAVPERSCOM msg dtg 311828Z MAR 00, advised command that per MPM 1910 – 708, when administrative board procedures are used and the board is waived, the command shall forward the case to GCMCA or higher for separation authority.
Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              1      
         Other Period of Service:                                    0      
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0      
         Education :                                           0      
         Employment :                                          0      
         Health /Medical :                                       0      
         Character Statements:                               0      
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0      
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0      
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0      

Total Number of Pages:                              1      

D escription of Other Documentation:
             

Issues (as summarized by NDRB):
1. Enhance employment and education opportunities
2. Previously punished for same reason discharged
3. Characterization not warranted by overall service record     

Discussion

Issue(s) 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Decisional Issues:

Issue 2 ( ). Punishment for violations of the UCMJ can be imposed pursuant to provisions of the Manual for Courts-Martial. Such misconduct, under circumstances as described per regulation, may also be a reason for subsequent administrative discharge. Administrative discharge proceedings for identified misconduct do not constitute additional punishment. Whether or not a servicemember warrants administrative discharge as a result of misconduct is a separate process and determination from whether or not that servicemember’s behavior constitutes misconduct. Relief is not warranted on this issue.

Issue 3 ( ). For reasons set forth below regarding the Board’s finding that the Applicant’s discharge was improper, the Board determined that the characterization of the Applicant’s service was inconsistent with standards of discipline in the naval service. Relief granted on this issue.

Although not raised as an issue by the Applicant, the Board found that the Applicant’s discharge was improper. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include eviden ce submitted by the Applicant. The Board noted that the Applicant appeared to have been discharged some 5 months beyond the end of his obligated 3-year plus 12 month extension active duty service requirement per his initial enlistment contract. The Board found that , per the Commanding Officer’s recommendation for administrative separation, the Applicant re-enlisted on 19990730 for a period of 4 years. As a result, however, the Applicant did not qualify for discharge for reason of misconduct – pattern of misconduct because that reason required two or more nonjudicial punishments, court-martial, or civil convictions (or combination thereof) during the current enlistment. The Applicant had only 1 nonjudicial punishment subsequent to 19990730. Therefore, his misconduct was not a pattern. The Board specifically considered whether or not the reference to re-enlistment was administrative error and whether or not the nonjudicial punishment for violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ constituted a separate reason for discharge for misconduct – commission of a serious offense. In light of all the facts and circumstances, the Board found that the preponderance of the evidence supported the conc lusion that, while styled an Article 92 offense , Applicant was more likely than not properly punished for a “failure to go” to remedial physical training in violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ. Such an offense does not constitute misconduct – commission of a serious offense for the purpose of administrative discharge. After finding the discharge improper, the Board determined that Sailors do not, generally, receive less than honorable discharges for a PRT failure or an incident of failure to go. Therefore, the Board determined, that the Applicant’s misconduct , while wrongful, did not constitute “significant negative aspects of conduct or performance of duty” that outweighed positive aspects of his service record as defined by regulation for a characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) .

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found , for reasons indicated above, the Applicant’s discharge im proper and in equitable and granted relief .

Minority Opinion


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 1997 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial does not authorize the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 , Absence without leave (failure to go to appointed place of duty) .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500895

    Original file (ND0500895.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. THE DENIAL OF “MEDICAL TREATMENT.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s Medical Health Care Records (Active Service) (22 pages) Applicant’s Medical Health Care Records (After discharge from service) (28 pages) Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1) Applicant’s DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700247

    Original file (ND0700247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19900507 - 19901001Active: 19901002 - 1995092819950929 - 19980910 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980911Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20000223 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: 19 Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 56Highest Rank/Rate:AC2Evaluation marks (# of occasions): Performance: 3.0(2) Behavior: 2.5(2) OTA: 2.64 Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):MERITORIOUS UNIT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700603

    Original file (ND0700603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Absent any documentation provided by the Applicant for the Board to consider, the Board determined that the Applicant’s service record did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990528...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601147

    Original file (ND0601147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19970218Reason for Discharge due to: Sexual behavior which deviates from socially acceptable standards Statement that you are a homosexual or bisexual.Least Favorable Characterization: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19970218Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600951

    Original file (ND0600951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Equity – Post service Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)One page from the Applicant’s Service RecordApplicant’s Statement, (no signature and no date) (2 pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300680

    Original file (ND1300680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : After...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900377

    Original file (ND0900377.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Was issued an RE-4 Code which makes him ineligible for reenlistment and the GI Bill.2.Chain of command misled him and discouraged him from requesting a court-martial.3. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800825

    Original file (MD0800825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant provided a certificate of National Service, , and a witness to corroborate his post-service accomplishments.While the Board acknowledges the Applicant’s community service and his continued pursuit...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600055

    Original file (ND0600055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 020913: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and by vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.021003: Commanding Officer, USS JARRETT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901929

    Original file (ND0901929.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted...