Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601053
Original file (ND0601053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-MMFN, USN
Docket No. ND06-01053

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060808 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area . The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation by the American Legion.

Decision

A personal appearance hearing discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070404 . The Applicant, with representation, and his spouse provided testimony. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Issues submitted by Applicant’s representative ( American Legion):
“ (Equity Issue) The former member recognizes and regrets the mistakes that he made while serving in the Navy but believes that the positive aspects of his overall service record warrant a higher characterization of service than he was issued .

(Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application. ”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) (2)
Applicant’s ltr, dtd July 10, 2006
 Character Reference ltr from S_ E. F_, dtd October 11, 2006 (unsigned)
Character Reference ltr from B_ D. G_, undated
 Applicant’s ltr to Mr. R_ S_, dtd March 30, 2007
 Character Reference ltr from D_ A_-L_, dtd March 14, 2007 (2 pages)
Criminal records check, City of Claremore Police Department, dtd March 29, 2007
Ltr from J_ G_, G_ L_ Mental Health Center, Inc., dtd March 29, 2007
Professional Builder Certification for T_ E. T_ (Applicant’s spouse), Oklahoma State Home Builders Association, undated
 Cherokee Nation TERO certification of B_ Contractors, LLC, dtd October 2, 2006.
Better Business Bureau certificate for B_ Contractors, LLC Excellence in Customer Service , 2006
Rogers County Builders Association “Builder Member in Good Standing” Certificate to T_ T_ (Applicant’s spouse) and B_ Contractors, LLC, for March 2006 – March 2007, dtd March 29, 2006



PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19890322 - 19890501       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19890502              Date of Discharge: 19920325

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 2 1 0 24 (Does not exclude lost time.)
          Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 2 3 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 22

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 3 0
Highest Rate: MM3

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2 . 7 ( 3 )               Behavior: 2 . 9 ( 3 )                          OTA: 3 . 2 7

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214) : Navy “E” Ribbon (2 nd Award), Combat Action Ribbon, Navy Unit Commendation, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, S outhwest Asia Service Medal w /two Stars, Kuwait Liberation Medal.

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

89032 2 :  Applicant certifies in writing Drug and Alcohol Abuse Statement of Understanding .

910201:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Wrongfully storing a bullet in his locker on or about 910124.
 Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
910615:  CO’s NJP of 910201, punishment regarding forfeiture disallowed this date. [The Board determined that “disallowed” meant “set aside.”]

920217:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0730.
920311:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1253 (2 3 days/surrendered).
920312 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a : Wrongful use of methamphetamine on or about 920215 .
 Award: Forfeiture of $ 4 00 .0 0 pay per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 3 . No indication of appeal in record.

920312 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by Nonjudicial Punishment on 920312.

920312 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel , e lected to waive all rights.
920312 :  Commanding Officer, USS MISSOURI , recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by nonjudicial punishment on 920312 .

920312:  Medical Entry: USS MISSOURI Medical Department, LCDR B. C. M_, MC, USN: Applicant not dependent on alcohol or drugs . D rug use was recreational and can be controlled by Applicant .

920319 :  BUPERS directed the Applicant's under other than honorable conditions discharge by reason of misconduct ( drug abuse ) (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19920325 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable ( B and C ). The Board presumed regularity in the co nduct of governmental affairs (D ).
Regarding the Applicant’s first issue, there is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs, a violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, and the Applicant testified to knowing, purposeful and continuous use of methamphetamine for a period of months, beginning while deployed in a war zone aboard a warship actively engaged in combat operations. At the time of the Applicant’s initial use, processing for separation was mandatory for all officers and petty officers for the first instance of illegal drug use. The Applicant was promoted to Machinist’s Mate Third Class on 911216. On 920301, processing for separation became mandatory for all Sailors who abused illegal drugs, regardless of rank and rate. The Applicant’s illegal drug use was identified upon his return from a period of unauthorized absence on 920311. The Applicant was properly processed for separation for his illegal drug use. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Board determined that the Applicant’s record of service was not so otherwise meritorious that his characterization of service was unwarranted. The Applicant’s contention that other Sailors, including some senior to him, also used illegal drugs did not excuse or mitigate his own use, or hi s failure to inform appropriate authorities of others’ use when it first came to his attention. The NDRB advises the Applicant that certain serious offenses warrant separation from the Navy in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged at a special or general court-martial. Relief based on the Applicant’s overall service record is not warranted .

Regarding the Applicant’s second issue as it pertains to post-service conduct, the NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided some character reference letters, and testimonial and documentary evidence regarding his post-service employment, drug rehabilitation treatment and subsequent sobriety, lack of criminal record, community service, and family life. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was insufficient to mitigate the misconduct which precipitated the discharge. Therefore, no relief will be granted.

The Applicant has exhausted his opportunities for review by the NDRB. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service, if he desires further review of his case.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .
C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600718

    Original file (MD0600718.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Board found no indication in the record that the Applicant was inequitably or improperly denied due process in either his NJP or administrative separation proceedings. The Board took note of the documents Applicant submitted indicating that he was notified of the recommendation for administrative separation on 19940921 and again on 19941019.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501510

    Original file (ND0501510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Now the military wants to discharge me because of the drug misdemeanor out in town. 040128: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct-civilian conviction and misconduct due to drug abuse.040128: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.040427: An Administrative Discharge Board,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600723

    Original file (MD0600723.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant informed the least favorable character of service possible was as general (under honorable conditions). Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions but in the Applicant’s case the Separation Authority directed a characterization of service of General (Under Honorable Conditions). You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501005

    Original file (ND0501005.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I strongly recommend that he be separated from the naval service and his service be characterized as Other Than Honorable”.010809: Commander, Submarine Group 9 The Applicant provided 12 character/job reference letters, 80 pages from his service record and 6 certificates of training earned during his service, as documentation of his post service accomplishments. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600478

    Original file (ND0600478.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Naval Mobile Constructionman Battalion FIVE, on active duty, having received a lawful order from Builder Constructionman T_ W. N_, U.S. Navy, a senior chief petty officer, then known by the said BUCN B_ to be a senior chief petty officer to have his FEX gear in his barracks room and not in Los Angeles, an order which it was his duty to obey, did at or near Naval Port...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501541

    Original file (ND0501541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I was given a direct order by my chain of command not to be in contact on or off the ship with N_. I didn’t understand why I was being told what decisions to make regarding my personal life and I quickly rebelled.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600634

    Original file (ND0600634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant objected to separation.910516: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions and recommended discharge be suspended for 12...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600432

    Original file (MD0600432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant understands that the separation authority may disapprove his request for a general discharge and award him an other than honorable characterization of service.020223: Medical Division, NAVCONBRIG MIRAMAR, San Diego, CA confinement evaluation.020225: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Conviction at a summary court martial held on 020222, at Spt Bn, RTR, MCRD San Diego, CA), and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.Applicant chose...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501353

    Original file (MD0501353.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ” • The Applicant was awarded nonjudicial punishment for violating Article 112a of the UMCJ.Therefore, the Board found there is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Therefore, the Board determined the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501384

    Original file (MD0501384.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5. (note: not dated)921207: Veteran’s Administration Statement of Understanding: Applicant signed statement: Although I...