Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600992
Original file (ND0600992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AA, USN
ND06-00992

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060724
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                milpersman 1910-146
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       uss abraham lincoln (cvn-72)

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NONE REQUESTED
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                              DESIGNATED


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                            20 070606
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package :                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        
(BCD only) The Board found that clemency was:  

By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .


Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                20021221 - 20020828       COG
Active: None                                     

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20020829
Years Contracted :                                   ;      
Date of Discharge:                                  20040614
Length of Service:                                  01 Yrs 09 Mos 16 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                          
                                                     
                          
Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                     18
AFQT:                                                 34
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   AN

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 Performance /Behavior/OTA :                          1.0 (1)   1.0 (1)  2.00
        
Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20040517 :         NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20040510 , tested positive for THC.

20040521 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Specification: On or about 20040324, wrongfully use marijuana.
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 694 for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days , reduction to E-2.
         No indication of appeal in the record.

20040521:        NAVPERS 1070/613: Applicant declines rehabilitation treatment prior to separation.


Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation
Record not available.


Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                  ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDURE
Date Notified :                                        20040521
Reason(s):                                            MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                         

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20040521
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s)                       

Board Date :                                          NOT APPLICABLE
Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     ( 20040605 )
Discharge directed by (date):                       COMCRUDESGRU THREE ( 20040607 )
Narrative reason directed :                                   MISCONDUCT
Characterization of directed:                     
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20040614



Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service:
          Service/Medical Record :                              3
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           6
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0

Total Number of Pages:                              9

D escription of Other Documentation: None

Applicant’s Issues , as summarized by the Board :
1. Attend college, perhaps re-enter service
2. Unfair due to no opportunity to rehabilitate.
3 . Unfair because Applicant told he was not a good sailor.
4 . Post-service conduct.

Issue 1: T he Board determined that which can form the basis of relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this Issue .

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue(s) 2-4 for consideration.

Issue 2 ( Equity ). There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The record indicates that the Applicant refused rehabilitative treatment. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Issue 3 (Equity). The Applicant does not allege by whom, in what context, or under what circumstances he was referred to as “not a good sailor,” nor indicates how such a term, if used towards him at all, was unfair. Illegal drug use constitutes a significant departure from standards of performance and behavior expected of all Sailors , and constitutes a violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. The evidence shows that the Applicant used marijuana, and the Applicant does not deny it . The Board found no evidence in the record to indicate that the Applicant was improperly or unfairly treated. Relief denied.

Issue 4 (Equity). There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the misconduct which precipitated the discharge. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

 None .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.
C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substance .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601120

    Original file (ND0601120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Time Lost During This Period: 73Days Unauthorized Absence: 76Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 49Highest Rate/Rank:SAPerformance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):Performance: 1.0 (1)Behavior: 1.0 (1)OTA:1.00Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040311: Applicant to unauthorized absence. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601081

    Original file (ND0601081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall - .Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: NONEActive: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000330Years Contracted: YRSDate of Discharge: 20040823Length of Service: 04Yrs 04 Mos 24 DaysTime Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 32Highest Rate/Rank:SK3Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):Performance: 3.4 (5)Behavior: 3.2 (5)OTA:3.33Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601116

    Original file (ND0601116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation Record not available. Decisional Issues: Issue 1 ().There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs, and he admits to doing so. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601201

    Original file (ND0601201.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-EN3, USNND06-01201Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060921Characterization of Service: Narrative Reason for Separation: Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN1910-146Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: nar new orleans, laApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation:Applicant’s Issues as Summarized by the Board 1: Equity – Post service Decision: By a vote of the Characterization shall . ”...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601037

    Original file (ND0601037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed Robbery and used a firearm during the robbery in question. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601167

    Original file (ND0601167.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Characterization not warranted by overall service record 2. Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20000626-20000628-Active: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000629Years Contracted:; 26 MONTH EXTENSIONDate of Discharge: 20040712 Length of Service: 04Yrs 00 Mos 14 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 57Highest Rate/Rank:MA3Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601019

    Original file (ND0601019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board (PER DD FORM 214 BLOCK 26, SEPARATION CODE)Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Administrative Board Date: NOT APPLICABLERecommendation of Commanding Officer (date): Separation Authority (date):Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601113

    Original file (ND0601113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation Record not available. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601171

    Original file (ND0601171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): 20050913Separation Authority (date):COMNAVPERSCOM (20051005)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20051012 Additional Information Considered by Board Type of documentation submitted by the Applicant and considered by the Board Document Type #Pages Related to Period of Service Under Review:Service/Medical Record:03Other Period of Service: 13Related to Post-Service Period: Community...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601027

    Original file (ND0601027.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20040130Reason for Discharge MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSELeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040130Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Administrative Board Date: NOT APPLICABLERecommendation of Commanding Officer (date): Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDING OFFICER, U.S. NAVY...