Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600986
Original file (ND0600986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
ND06-00986

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060718
Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
                                                     
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MILPERSMAN 3630620
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       USS JOHN F KENNEDY CV-67

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NOT APPLICABLE
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                             20 0070709
The Discharge shall remain:                       
                                                     
Regarding p ropriety , the Board found the discharge :      
Regarding e quity , the Board found the discharge :         
Vot e (characterization/reason)                      /
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Discharge Package Complete:                       


Applicant’s Issues as Summarized by the Board:

 1. Equity – In service performance
2. Equity – Youth and Immaturity
3. Equity – Discharge negatively affects his ability to obtain employment that he desires



Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                19960821-19961124
Active:                                          NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 19961125
Years Contracted :                                        
Date of Discharge:                                  19980603
Length of Service:                                  01 Yrs 06 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                      NONE     
                                                      NONE     
                          
Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 42
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   AA

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 Performance /Behavior/OTA :                          3.0 (3) 2.0 (3) 2.7 8
         Extracted from: Supporting Documents Other:      

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, ARMED FORCES SERVICE MEDAL, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL





Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

19980501 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 112a : Did, in the continental United States, on or about 19980406, wrongfully use marijuana .
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 463 for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days , reduction to E-1 .
        No indication of appeal in the record.



Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                 
Date Notified :                                        19980501
Narrative Reason(s):                               
                                                     
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                         
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 19980501
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s)                       
GCMCA Review                               
Board Date :                                          NOT APPLICABLE
Finding of Administrative Board:                           NOT APPLICABLE
Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     19980502      
Discharge directed by (date):                       COMCARGRU 19980601      
Narrative reason directed :                                  
Characterization of directed:                     
Date Applicant Discharged:                         19980603



Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service:
          Service/Medical Record :                              54
         Other Period of Service:                                         
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                        
         Education :                                                
         Employment :                                               
         Health /Medical :                                            
         Character Statements:                                    
         Criminal Records Checks:                                         
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             2
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 2

Total Number of Pages:                              58

D escription of Other Documentation:
        Excerpt from Misconduct Regulations
         Excerpt from UCMJ Article 112a

Applicant’s Issues as Summarized by the Board:

 1. Equity – In service performance
2. Equity – Youth and Immaturity
 3. Equity – Discharge negatively affects his ability to obtain employment that he desires
The Applicant requests an upgrade because he feels that the overall character of his service was good. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a nonjudicial punishment proceeding for violations of UCMJ Articles 112a. Violations of UCMJ Article 112a are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized at courts martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his "youth and immaturity.” The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. It must be noted that most members of the Navy serve honorably and therefore earn their honorable discharges. In fairness to those members of the Navy, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. While the Applicant may feel that his youth and immaturity was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated that he was determined unfit for further service because of his drug use. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. Relief denied.

With regard to Issue 3, the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief on that basis . The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding employment and educational opportunities .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.
C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 11a (use of a controlled substance) .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601195

    Original file (ND0601195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.Regarding Applicant’s Issue 2 and 3, the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601110

    Original file (ND0601110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant is claiming youth and immaturity as contributing factors for his misconduct, the evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700085

    Original file (ND0700085.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) found that the governments actions were proper and equitable in administratively processing this case.Issue 3 ().The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his "Youth and Immaturity." After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700035

    Original file (ND0700035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: NOComplete Discharge Package: YES Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Issue 1 (Equity): The Applicant contends that his misconduct while in the Navy is attributable to his youth and immaturity at the time. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:19950726Reason for Discharge - - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700081

    Original file (ND0700081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20040529Reason for Discharge - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20040529Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (undated)Separation Authority (date):COMCARGRU SEVEN (20040626)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601015

    Original file (ND0601015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-SA, USNND06-01015Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060725Narrative Reason for Separation: misconductCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: USS JOHN C STENNIS (CVN74)Applicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to:NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20070614Vote (characterization/reason)/ Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601086

    Original file (ND0601086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 3 (Equity).The Applicant provides documentation of post-service conduct in support of his request for upgrade. Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600970

    Original file (MD0600970.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity – Post Service Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20020711 - 20030707Active: None Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030708Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20040419 Length of Service: 00Yrs 09 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Time Lost During This Period: 287Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 43MOS:9900Highest Rate/Rank:PvtPerformance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):Proficiency / Conduct: N/A Extracted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601148

    Original file (ND0601148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:19920914Reason for Discharge - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19920815Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19920821)Separation Authority (date):BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19921003)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601087

    Original file (ND0601087.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity – In Service Conduct Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990219 - 19990630 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990701Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 20020509 Length of Service: Active: 02Yrs 10 Mos 09 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any. Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20000419: Civil Conviction: General District Court, Traffic Division, Chesapeake, Virginia for...