Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600884
Original file (ND0600884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-YNSN, USN
ND06-00884
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20060620   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630620

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:                                           Representative: DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS
1. DD 214 fails to distinguish between honorable period of service and period characterized as under other than honorable conditions.
2. Post-service conduct.
Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .
Date: 20 0708 26                                               Washington D.C.

Applicant Testified:              Applicant Available for Questions:       Witnesses:      Observers:      
Discussion

Issue 1 . This issue is not an issue of propriety or equity regarding the discharge. However, the Board concurred with the Applicant that his DD 214 inaccurately characterized his entire service from 19880815 – 1993073 as under other than honorable conditions and will recommend an administrative correction as indicated below.

Issue 2 ( ). There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs , and the Applicant candidly acknowledged his use and possession of marijuana. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety or inequity during the discharge process. There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R ( ActMar)   19870724 - 19880714              Active: R (ActMar)        19880815 - 19910702
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19910703      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19930730
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 00 Mths 28 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: 1    Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 39          Highest Rank /Rate : YN3
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.9 ( 4 )       Behavior: 3.6 ( 4 )          OTA: 3.90
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): First Good Conduct Award for period ending 92JUL16, Letter of Commendation (3rd), Marksman .45 Caliber Pistol, National Defense Service Medal

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 1991 0703:        Reenlisted this date for a term of 5 years.

 1992 1009:        Military working dog responded to Applicant’s car during random inspection. Applicant consented to search of vehicle, person and room. Small seed that appeared to be marijuana seized from Applicant’s car, and small plastic bag containing approximately 1 gram of suspected marijuana seized from Applicant’s room.

1992 1009:        Applicant provided voluntary statement claiming that a friend had left the bag of marijuana in Applicant’s car and that Applicant intended to return to the friend but had not yet done so. Applicant also admitted having smoked marijuana approximately 3 weeks prior to this date.

 19 930622:        Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as other than honorable by reason of drug abuse as evidenced by NIS Report Case Control No. 17NOV92-06RL-0532-7NCR.

 19 930622:        Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.

 19 930624:        Medical officer examination did not reveal evidence of drug addiction and or alcohol dependency.

 19 930625:        An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

 19 930630:        Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana possession, ashore on duty. Abuse denied. Method of identification: Military police 931009. Clinical screener recommended Level I treatment. Physician found Applicant not dependent and recommended Level I treatment. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: Member apprehended for possession of marijuana on station. DAAR submitted late due to a delay in administrative processing. Member recommended for OTH discharge.

 19 930706*:       Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
         [*Document indicates date of “6 JUN 93;” appears to be clerical error.]

19 930713:        Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0730.

 19 930714:        Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0830 (1 day/surrendered).

 19 930723:        BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

 19 951128:        NDRB conducted documentary review of Applicant’s discharge, docket number ND95-01391. Discharge determined to be proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative: Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401324

    Original file (ND1401324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because it is based on a misconduct that occurred in his finale enlistment, and not on his total record of service.2. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401356

    Original file (ND1401356.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana seven times prior to entering the Navy.Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. Despite the Applicant’s confession, his command did not punish him at NJP or court-martial, but opted instead to administratively process him for separation for reason of drug abuse. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00366

    Original file (MD01-00366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. MD01-00366 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010202, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500206

    Original file (MD0500206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to “Medical” and “Also the RE code s/b changed.” The Applicant requested a documentary record review. The medical narrative is in error when it states that I used marijuana twice in high school. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401369

    Original file (ND1401369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00609

    Original file (ND04-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Identify an AA home group within 30 days of completing treatment. I recommend he be separated Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.”020808: Commander, Cruiser-Destroyer Group FIVE authorize the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401333 (1)

    Original file (ND1401333 (1).rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401333

    Original file (ND1401333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801270

    Original file (ND0801270.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge.The Applicant submitted evidence of education, employment, and several reference letters to support her contention of good post-service conduct. The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801745

    Original file (ND0801745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The administrative separation board ultimately recommended he should be separated from the Navy with an “Under Other Than Honorable ” discharge.The NDRB found, after a thorough review of the former service member’sSummary of Service, Service and Medical Records, Discharge Process and additional evidence submitted by his family that as a result of his confirmed bipolar condition and the mitigating factors of his emotional distress, relief was warranted. The Board determined an upgrade in the...