Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600837
Original file (ND0600837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND06-00837

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060601 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070315 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offense - absent without leave - 30 days or more .





PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues
         Equity: Mental health condition precipitated misconduct.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Service 2)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         A ctive: US A      19890829 - 19911204       HON
         Ina ctive: USN R (DEP)      20000525 - 20000604       COG

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20000605              Date of Discharge: 20010905

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 0 1 0 3 11 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 72 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 33

Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 7 0

 Highest Rate: SN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                                     Behavior: NA*             OTA: NA*
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): N one.

* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Articl e 1910-142.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

010516 :  Applicant to unauthorized absence. [Extracted from DD Form 214, Block 29.]

010726 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence ( 72 days ). [Extracted from DD Form 214, Block 29.]

010905 :  DD Form 214: Applicant discharge d under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-142.

Service Record did not contain the Ad ministrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20010905 by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offense - absent without leave - 30 days or more (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).
The Applicant’s DD Form 214 documents an unauthorized absence period from 20010516 to 20010726 (72 days). In the absence of a complete discharge package, the Board presumed that the Applicant was properly notified, processed, and discharged in accordance with MILPERSMAN 1910-142. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption of regularity by presenting any substantial and credible evidence. The Applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to challenge the propriety or equity of the discharge. Therefore, the Board considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Relief not warranted.

Equity – Mental health condition precipitated misconduct: When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. The NDRB generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition, the implied incorrect diagnosis, nor the medical treatment given to the Applicant to be of sufficient nature to excuse the Applicant’s misconduct. In fact, the NDRB sees no connection between the Applicant’s misconduct and his purported medical condition. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to the discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 31, effective
25 Jan 01 until 21 Aug 02, Article 1910-142 [formerly 3630605]. SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 Unauthorized absence – 30 days or more .
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600126

    Original file (ND0600126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Therefore, it is recommended that Seaman Recruit Y_ (Applicant) be separated from the naval service with an Other Than Honorable discharge.”GCMCA, Chief of Naval Education and Training directed the Applicant's discharge with other than honorable by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense.990120: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501289

    Original file (ND0501289.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “General RE code.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00438

    Original file (ND04-00438.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). A characterization of my mental illness is psychotic behavior and delusions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (3) Applicant’s DD Form 214 (previous enlistment) (2) Twenty-seven pages from Applicant’s service record Chaminade...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500340

    Original file (ND0500340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Time Lost During This Period (days): Unauthorized absence: 13 days Confinement: None Age at Entry: 30 Years Contracted: 4 (12 month extension) Education Level: 16 AFQT: 79 Highest Rate: ABH3 (SW, AW) Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: NA* Behavior: NA* OTA: NA* Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501467

    Original file (ND0501467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 980406: Applicant missed ship’s movement.981117: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1755 on 981117 (227 days/apprehended).990115: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense - absent without leave - 30 days or more, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600304

    Original file (ND0600304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged, in absentia, on 20050413 by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600537

    Original file (ND0600537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). ]001227: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense - absence without leave - 30 days or more, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-142.Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00456

    Original file (ND02-00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00456 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020225, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. On May 4 th I was informed that I was not going to be transferred and that all request where denied.My dad's condition was serious so I took the matter upon myself to leave my duty station on May 6 th 2000 and return home to provide care for my father. I received a General Discharge (under honorable conditions) and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501129

    Original file (ND0501129.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19970701 Date of Discharge: 20000723 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 00 23 (Does not exclude lost time.) The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600833

    Original file (ND0600833.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). No indication of appeal in the record.000316: DD Form 214:Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document...