Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600669
Original file (ND0600669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-ASAN, USN
Docket No. ND06-00669

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060419 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070201 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.















PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues
Equity – Quality of service

 Propriety – Due process
Documentation
In addition to the service and medical record s , the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Service 7)
Statement from Applicant , undated (2 pages)
Certificate for superior performance during April 2003
 Good Conduct Award certificate, dated September 12, 2004
Letter of Commendation, dated October 25, 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20010421 - 20010912       COG
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20010913              Date of Discharge: 20050223

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 3 0 5 11
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 18
Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 63

Highest Rate: AS 3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NA*                            Behavior: NA*              OTA: NA*
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): First Good Conduct Medal for period ending 04Sep12, N ational Defense Service Medal .
* Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

041029:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 041026, tested positive for cocaine.

 041229 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a : Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 792.00 per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 3 . No indication of appeal in the record.

 050110 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

050110 :  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to waive all rights.
050124 :  Commanding Officer, Strike Fighter Wing, U.S. Atlantic Fleet, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct - drug abuse.
050203 :  C OM NAV AIRLANT Norfolk, VA , directed the Applicant 's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.


Service Record was missing ele ments of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20050223 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Equity – Quality of service: The Applicant contends that his discharge is unjust because at the time of the misconduct he had been in the Navy for over three years without any disciplinary problems.

 There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for illegal drug use, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considers his discharge proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Propriety – Due process: The Applicant states that he “was given the run around” at the time of his administrative processing.

 In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. The Applicant was properly notified of his Commanding Officer’s intent to administratively separate him. The Applicant was informed of his rights and initially requested to appear before an administrative board. After consulting with counsel, the Applicant decided to waive his right to appear before an administrative board. The record contains no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone involved in the discharge process. Relief denied.

For the Applicant’s edification, the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces. The NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.



The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500618

    Original file (ND0500618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. 890726: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700550

    Original file (ND0700550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and the characterization of his service. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500590

    Original file (ND0500590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. As of this time, the Applicant’s post-service conduct has been insufficient to mitigate his misconduct while in the Naval service. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500586

    Original file (ND0500586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00586 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050223. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to general/under honorable conditions. 040301: Applicant discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801379

    Original file (ND0801379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation:From Congress member: Other Documentation (Describe): - DD Form 149 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700568

    Original file (MD0700568.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19991008 - 19991128Active: 19991129 - 20031001 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031002Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20050713Length of Service: 01 Yrs 09Mths11 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 36MOS:0811Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):Fitness reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):GCM, GWOTSM, NDSM, SSDR, NUC, KCM, NATO,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900373

    Original file (ND0900373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenseshe committed. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500628

    Original file (ND0500628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant contends that his military service aboard the USS AMERICA (CV 66), during which time he received numerous awards, is deserving of an honorable discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101039

    Original file (MD1101039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Full relief to Honorable was not granted due to the serious nature of drug abuse in the Marine Corps.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300613

    Original file (ND1300613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...