Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600601
Original file (ND0600601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND06-00601

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060301 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “ honorable .” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area. T he Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained the Disabled American Veterans as his representative .

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. Metropolitan area on 20070509. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts and circumstances unique to this case, t he Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D) at the time of issuance. However, after consideration of the Applicant's post service accomplishments, the Board determined that partial relief was warranted. The Board voted three to two that the discharge characterization shall change to general (under honorable conditions) and voted unanimously that the reason for discharge remain the same. The discharge shall be changed to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-1 40 , Separation Code “ HKA . ”




PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues
Issues submitted by Applicant ’s R epresentative ( Disabled American Veterans ):

Equity: Post Service

Equity: Youth and Immaturity
Documentation
In addition to the service and medical record s , the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant , was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)
Job reference from Saline County Sheriff’s Search and Rescue, dated November 28, 2005
Saline County Sheriff’s Department back ground check on Applicant , dated November 28, 2005
Character Reference ltr from B_ H_, Owner/Instructor, Scuba Dreams Dive Training and Travel, dated December 21, 2005
 Character Reference ltr from W _ R_, Lieutenant Governor, State of Arkansas, dated December 14, 2005
 Letter to Applicant from M_ R_, Congress of the United States, House of Representatives, dated December 13, 2005
Character Reference ltr from T_ D. M_, dated November 23, 2005
Letter from B_ A, State Representative, State of Arkansas, House of Representatives, dated November 15, 2005
 Character Reference ltr from G_ H_, Assistant Principal, Ringgold Elementary, dated November 22, 2005
Character Reference ltr from B_ D. P_, dated November 16, 2005
Character Reference ltr from B_ J. B_, O.D., Mena Eye Care, dated September 25, 2005
Character Reference ltr from J_ H_, P.A., Attorney at Law, dated November 14, 2005
 Character Reference ltr from M_ W. B_, Ed.D., Retired, undated
Character Reference ltr from E_ D_ M_, Applicant ’s mother, dated January 31, 2006

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19890727 - 19890809       COG
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19890810              Date of Discharge: 19910624

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 0 1 1 0 15 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 77 day s
         Confinement:              31 day s

Age at Entry: 23

Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 1 3 ½                        AFQT: 26

Highest Rate: AN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2 . 8 ( 1 )               Behavior: 2 . 8 ( 1 )                  OTA: 2.80

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal ; Battle “E” Ribbon


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900401:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0715.

 900404:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1830 (3 days/surrendered).
900413:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence on or about 0715, 900401 to 1830, 900404.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 90 : Failure to obey a lawful command from a superior commissioned officer on or about 900331.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Dereliction of duties on or about 900329.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongful use of a false or unauthorized pass on or about 900331.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 10 0 . 00 per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 2 0 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
900413 :  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency ( You were awarded CO’s NJP on 900413 for Article 86, 90, 92. At mast you were counseled by the Commanding Officer regarding your deficiencies. Such conduct is prejudicial to good order and discipline and will not be tolerated. ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
900718:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Wrongfully possessing 2 Armed Forces identification cards.
         Award: Forfeiture of $75.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 10 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

 901031 :  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700. [Extracted from message R 110900Z Dec 90.]

901130 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 0730 ( 30 d ays/surrendered).
901130:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 1000.

 901 211 :  Applicant declared a deserter due to his flight to avoid prosecution.
910114 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1515 ( 4 4 days/surrendered). [Extracted from message R 151500Z Jan 91.]

91 0314 :  S pecial Court-Martial.
          Charge: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs)
         Specification 1 : UA from USS CARL VINSON CVN-70 from 901016 to 901022 (6 days).
         Specification 2: UA from USS CARL VINSON CVN-70 from 901026-901029 (3 days).
         Specification 3: UA from USS CARL VINSON CVN-70 from 901031 to 901130 ( 30 days).
         Specification 4: UA from USS CARL VINSON CVN-70 from 901130 to 910114 (4 4 days).
         Finding: to Charge and the specifications thereunder, guilty.
          Sentence: Forfeiture of $200.00 per month for 2 months, confinement for 45 days, reduction to E-1.
          CA action 910401 : [Extracted from Commanding Officer, TPU Puget Sound ltr to CNPC dated 910521.]

910314:  Applicant to confinement. [Extracted from undated court memorandum NAVPERS.]

910413:  Applicant from confinement. [Extracted from undated court memorandum NAVPERS.]
910415 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense , as evidenced by special court-martial of 910314, Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900718, and Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900413, and by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, as evidenced by special court-martial of 910314, Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900718, and Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900413 .

910415 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
910521 :  Commanding Officer, Transient Personnel Unit, Puget Sound, Seattle, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, as evidenced by special court-martial of 9103 1 4, Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900718, and Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900413, and by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, as evidenced by special court-martial of 910314, Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900718, and Commanding Officer’s nonjudicial punishment of 900413.

910614 :  BUPERS directed the Applicant 's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct.






PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19910624 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

Equity: Post Service: The Applicant is requesting a discharge characterization upgrade to honorable based on his post service accomplishments.
The Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct was sufficiently creditable to warrant an upgrade to his characterization of service to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s employment, community service, and strong references demonstrated that he possessed the character and drive that was not evident during his tour of active duty. His post-service actions demonstrate that his misconduct was based on poor judgment and a lack of understanding, not reflective of his overall character. However, the Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct does not sufficiently mitigate his misconduct while on active duty to warrant full relief in the form of an honorable discharge. Therefore, partial relief is granted.

Equity: Youth and Immaturity: The Applicant claims th at poor decisions during his period of active service were based on youth and immaturity.

The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his "youthful decisions based on immaturity." While he may feel that his youth and immaturity was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief on this basis is denied.

During the personal appearance hearing the Applicant requested that his narrative reason be changed to secretarial authority. In cases where no other reason for separation set forth in the Naval Military Personnel Manual is appropriate, but where separation of a member is considered to be in the best interest of the service, the Secretary of the Navy has the authority to direct the separation of any member prior to the expiration of their term of service. The Applicant’s Commanding Officer determined the Applicant had no potential for further Naval service. The basis for his determination is clearly documented in the service record. There is no other narrative reason for separation which accurately describes the reason the Applicant was separated. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the reason for the Applicant’s discharge shall not change.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. The Applicant has exhausted his opportunities for review by the NDRB. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service, if he desires further review of his case.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A, Change 8 effective 21 Aug 89 until 14 Aug 91), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (Unauthorized absence more than 30 days) , 90 (Failure to obey a lawful command), 92 ( Dereliction of duties) and 134 (Wrongful use of a false or unauthorized pass).

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .









PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501401

    Original file (ND0501401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Reference Letter from C_ B_(Applicant’s mother) dtd August 9, 2005 Reference Letter from Mr E_ P_, dtd January 17, 2005 Character Reference Letter from E_ B_ M_, dtd December 13, 2004 Letter from Applicant dtd...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501541

    Original file (ND0501541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). I was given a direct order by my chain of command not to be in contact on or off the ship with N_. I didn’t understand why I was being told what decisions to make regarding my personal life and I quickly rebelled.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600040

    Original file (ND0600040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00040 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051004. 990820: Commanding Officer, USS CARL VINSON (CVN 70), recommended the Commander, Carrier Group THREE, that the Applicant be discharged with under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by his nonjudicial punishment imposed on 15 July 1999 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. The Applicant is advised that the Veterans Administration determines...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601035

    Original file (ND0601035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.20040308: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of Misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and Misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.20040308: Advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, the Applicant elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01189

    Original file (ND03-01189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500927

    Original file (ND0500927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    960201: Punishment of RIR to AOAA, forfeit $213 pay per month for 1 month, and 7 days extra duty suspended at CO’s NJP of 951116 vacated this date due to continued misconduct.Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Commanding Officer’s non-judicial punishment of 960201 for unauthorized absence from 0600, 951202 to 1200, 951202; and for unauthorized absence from 0600, 960113 to 1010, 969113), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00128

    Original file (ND00-00128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900412: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct due to commission of serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions and further recommended that the discharge not be suspended. Accordingly, I concur with the Board's recommendation that ABFAA (Applicant) be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600228

    Original file (ND0600228.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s Ltr, dtd April 19, 2005].050112: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.050112: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.050122: COMCARSTRKGRU...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500978

    Original file (ND0500978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Specification: In that Yeoman Seaman A_ A_, U.S. Navy, Strike Fighter Squadron 147, having knowledge of lawful order issued by Commander B_ I_, Commanding Officer, that liberty for E-3 and below expired at 2400 on the pier in Fremantle, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, on or about 30 April 2002 fail to obey the same by being in Perth after 2400.Award: Forfeiture of ½ pay per month for 2 months (suspended for six months), reduction to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600115

    Original file (ND0600115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). After this time we were getting ready to ship out on the 2 nd West Pac. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.