Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600547
Original file (ND0600547.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND06-00547

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060310 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20061214 . After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.



PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Issues

Equity: Under other than honorable conditions discharge not warranted.
Equity: Post-service conduct.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
 Character Reference ltr from S _ G _ Jr., dtd September 16, 2005
Ltr from Applicant, dtd February 22, 2006

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19931230 - 19940622       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19940623              Date of Discharge: 19970224

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 2 0 8 0 2
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 21

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 35

Highest Rate: SA

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.3 ( 3 )              Behavior: 1.5 ( 3 )                          OTA: 1.92

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630605.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950901 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 : Unauthorized absence, 950819.
         Violation of UCMJ, Article 92 : Dereliction of duties .
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 113 : Sleeping on post.
         Award: R estriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E- 1 (suspended for 6 months) . No indication of appeal in the record.
950901 :  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency ( NJP for VUCMJ Article 86, Article 92, and Article 113 .), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
960214 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespectful to a petty officer.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92 : Failure to obey lawful order
         Award: Correctional custody for 30 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
960214:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (NJP for VUCMJ Article s 91 and 92), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
970109:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: 45 days restriction and extra duty. No indication of appeal in the record.
970224:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, board waived.

Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19970224 by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. In the Applicant’s case, in the absence of a complete discharge package and without credible and substantial evidence to refute the Board’s presumption, the Board invoked the presumption of regularity. Specifically, the Board presumed that the Applicant was properly notified of his Commanding Officer’s intent to administratively process the Applicant for separation, that the Applicant was afforded all rights which he elected at notification and that the Applicant’s discharge was directed by proper authority.

The Applicant contends that his misconduct did not warrant an under other than honorable conditions character of service. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and three nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86, 91, 92 and 113 of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s violations of Articles 91, 92 and 113 of the UCMJ are serious offenses. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant implies through his supporting documents that his discharge is inequitable based on his post service accomplishments. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective
03 Oct 96 until 971212, Article 3630605, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 91, insubordinate conduct, Article 92, failure to obey order/regulation or Article 113, misbehavior of sentinel or lookout.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600595

    Original file (ND0600595.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). It is my deepest desire that these achievements not only reflect well upon me, but also on the Department of the Navy and the values that they stand for.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Journeyman Wireman Diploma, dtd June 1, 2002 Bachelor of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600480

    Original file (ND0600480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to honorable. The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501256

    Original file (ND0501256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested a record review and that his characterization of service be changed to honorable. Under applicable regulations, separations based on the best interest of the service – secretarial authority should be honorable unless a general (under honorable conditions) is warranted. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01022

    Original file (ND00-01022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 901015: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from USS KITTY HAWK, from 0700-0830, 901007, violation of UCMJ Article 92: Derelict in the performance of duty on or about 901007 by failing to clean work center space in a timely manner. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01178

    Original file (ND01-01178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.950511: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0715, 11May95.950509: USS SAVANNAH (AOR 4) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense.950510: Applicant advised of his rights and having...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500933

    Original file (ND0500933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After reviewing these records, I feel that my conduct may not have warranted an other than honorable discharge. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his characterization of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600192

    Original file (ND0600192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as stated The Applicant and his Representative submitted the following issue, which supersedes all prior issues submitted to the Board: “ Equity Issue: On the basis of the medical opinion or record, The American Legion request on this Applicant’s behalf that his characterization of service be upgraded to Honorable because his pattern of misconduct was directly related to his pattern of misconduct was directly related to his undiagnosed mental health condition.In accordance with Title...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00907

    Original file (ND04-00907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In his written statement PNSA B_ ( Applicant ) blames his chain of command for not sending him to CAAC to solve his alcohol problem, which he states resulted in him going to NJP twice. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501507

    Original file (ND0501507.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19900329 Date of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500772

    Original file (ND0500772.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050812. CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.Complete discharge package not contained in service record The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards