Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600460
Original file (ND0600460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USNR
Docket No. ND06-00460

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060210 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20061214 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions ) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.






PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Equity: Isolated incident with mitigating circumstances.
Equity: Characterization does not consider complete service or statements of supervisors.
Equity: Post-service accomplishments .

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
7 pages from Applicant’s Service Record
 Character Reference ltr from LtCol C_ R. P _ , USAF Ret., dtd February 1, 2006
 Character Reference ltr from S_ L_, dtd February 1, 2006
 Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 199103 15              Date of Discharge: 19921231

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 1 0 8 25
         Inactive: 00 00 11

Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 31

Years Contracted: 8

Education Level: GED                        AFQT: 63

Highest Rate: SN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4 . 0 ( 2 )              Behavior: 3 . 4 ( 2 )                 OTA: 3 . 75

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214) : Navy Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal



Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENER AL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) / Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910326 :  Commenced active duty for a period of 24 months.

910327 :  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.

920724:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 920720, tested positive for THC.
920813 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a : Wrongful use of a controlled substance – THC.
         Specification: Did onboard USS CAPE COD (AD 43), located at Pier 7, Naval Station, San Diego, CA, on or about 920720, wrongfully use a THC, a controlled substance.
 Award: Forfeiture of $ 440.00 pay per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 2 . Appealed 920818.

920826 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the characterization of service under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by [Applicant’s] drug incident during current enlistment.

920904 :  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
920930:  Commander, Destroyer Squadron 13 , denied Applicant’s appeal of nonjudicial punishment.   

921110:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge with a under honorable conditions (general).
921202:  Commanding Officer, USS CAPE COD (AS 43) recommended discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments: “ SA E_ (Applicant) has displayed flagrant disregard for representative authority, good order, and discipline. The presence of this member in an operational environment seriously impairs combat readiness, efficiency, security, and morale. SA E_ (Applicant) is no longer suited for further military service and is strongly recommended for immediate discharge. ”

921216:  BUPERS, directed the Applicant's discharge with a under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19921231 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under honorable conditions (general). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant contends that his discharge is inequitable because it was the result of an isolated in cident under mitigating circumstances and does not consider the Applicant’s complete service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, the Board determined the Applicant’s general discharge was warranted considering significant negative aspect of the Applicant’s violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ, the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant contends that his discharge is inequitable due to his post-service accomplishments. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.
Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB ) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .
PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00158

    Original file (ND03-00158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :900316: Retention Warning from Recruit Training Command, Great Lakes, IL: Advised of deficiency (due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to disclose your pre-service civil involvement – May 89 – burglary, possession of tools used in burglary; was sent to pre-trial intervention program and after completion of the program the charges were dropped), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600208

    Original file (ND0600208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I think its time the Navy review the 0 tolerance rule, and add the drug of alcohol to it!” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) Extracts from Applicant’s Service Record (45 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501474

    Original file (ND0501474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19921102 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. The Board advises the Applicant and counsel that when the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01009

    Original file (ND04-01009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01009 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040608. On 910117, CAAC was notified that SNM had tested positive for THC on a urinalysis conducted prior to the screening. Applicant did not object to separation.910321: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: During a random drug test, the Applicant tested positive for abuse of marijuana on or about 901219 ashore-off duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500012

    Original file (ND0500012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 020503: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700118

    Original file (ND0700118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20070830Location:Washington D.C.The Board found that Discussion Issue 1 ().When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19930730 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) ) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930804) Separation Authority...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600055

    Original file (ND0600055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 020913: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and by vote of 2 to 1, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.021003: Commanding Officer, USS JARRETT...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600612

    Original file (ND0600612.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). ), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.020308: NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 020301, tested positive for amphetamine, methamphetamine and THC.020314: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days and reduction...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00425

    Original file (ND99-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 940120 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01330

    Original file (ND04-01330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition.Review of the available records reflect that this former member maintained satisfactory...