Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601077

Original file (MD0601077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMCR
MD06-01077

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060808
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT
Character of Service:                                OTHER THAN HONORABLE
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.6
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       SACO SOI TRNGCMD CAMLEJ NC

Applicant’s Request:
         Narrative Reason change to:               NO NE REQUESTED
         Characterization chang e to:
         Review Requested :
Representation:

Decision:

Date of Decision:                                            200706 28
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        NO
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMC R (DEP)                               * 20001024-2001 11126 COG
Active:                                    NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 * 2001 1 126
Years Contracted :                                   8 ;
Date of Discharge:                                  20020208
Length of Service:                                  * 01 Yrs 07 Mos 19 Days ^{Does not exclude lost time, if any.}
Time Lost During This Period:                      1 78
Days Unauthorized Absence:                         14 8
Days Confinement:                                   30

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 37
MOS:                                                   9900
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   PFC

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
P roficiency :                                         3.6 ( 3 )
Conduct :                                              2.4 (3)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
RIFLE MARKSMAN BADGE

*THE NDRB NOTED MULTIPLE ERRONEOUS AND CONFLICTING ENTRIES OF DATES IN THE RECORD; NONE OF WHICH ESTABLISH A LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE FOR CORRECTNESS.

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20010314:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Y our diagnosed physical condition not a disability, (lower back pain) and any resultant or aggravated condition which interferes with the effective performance of your duties. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20010315:        To u nauthorized absence.

20010412:        From u nauthorized absence.

20010502:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Unauthorized absence from SOI, TrngCmd, CamLej from 0800, 20010315 to 0900, 20010412 . N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.

20010515 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: UA from 20010315 to 20010412.
         Award: Forfeiture of $521 for 2 months, restriction for 60 days, reduction to E-1.
         Not appealed.

20010518:        To u nauthorized absence.

20010617:        Applicant declared a deserter.

20010918:        From u nauthorized absence (surrendered). Deserter status rescinded.

20011114:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct. Unauthorized absence from 20010518 to 20010918. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20011114 :        Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge: V iolation of the UCMJ, Article 86 .
         Specification: UA from 0700, 20010518 to 1600, 20010 9 18.
         Finding: Guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 30 days, forfeiture of $695.00.
         CA action 20011114: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

20011114:        To c onfinement.

20011210:        From c onfinement.

Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Date Notified :                                        NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Basis for Discharge :                                NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Least Favorable Characterization:                          NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation :    NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                          YES
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Administrative Board                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Obtain Copies                              NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Submit Statement(s) (date)                          NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
SJA review (date):                                   NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Discharge directed by (date):                       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Narrative reason directed :                                   NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Characterization directed:                                  NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20020208

Additional Information Considered by Board

Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board

        Document Type                                        #Pages
Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                            2
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                     0
         Character Statements:                               1
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             2
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 0

Total Number of Pages:                            5

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
1. To be able to rejoin the military.
2. Change reenlistment code.
3. Unfair discharge characterization because of immaturity at time of offense.
4. Post service.

Issues 1 and 2: The Board determined that these Issues were not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue.

Decisional Issues:
The Board accepted Issues 3-4 for consideration.

Issue 3 (Equity). The Applicant contends that his problems were attributed to his immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, the award of one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) , Article 86, and a guilty plea and finding at a Summary Court Martial for Article 86 ( over 30 days. V iolation of UCMJ Articles 86 (over 30 days) is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief denied

Issue 4 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided one character statement and a career achievements data sheet as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

None

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, Unauthorized absence more than 30 days.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401205

Original file (MD1401205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps, MMSB-13, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, along with the personal testimony of the Applicant and his witness, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500604

Original file (MD1500604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL. ” Additional Reviews :...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600997

Original file (MD0600997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Therefore, relief is not warranted on the mere fact that the Applicant had no documented misconduct.However, in conducting its review, the Board determined from the record that the Applicant’s diagnosis of pes planus was accurate, that he did not contribute to creating the condition, that he was compliant with all medical and therapeutic efforts to overcome his condition, that discharge was appropriate, that under the circumstances of the his case any “significant negative aspects of his...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201599

Original file (MD1201599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT ,...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601047

Original file (MD0601047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20020410Basis for Discharge: MISCONDUCT, COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSELeast Favorable Characterization: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20020411Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Recommendation of Commanding Officer...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601073

Original file (MD0601073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [REQUESTED BY MEMBER] Discharge Process:Date Member Requested Separation:20010807Member Requested Separation Due To: Characterization Requested: member Recognized Least Favorable:Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): , (UNDATED) SJA review (date): (20010813)Discharge directed by (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING, CHERRY POINT, NC (20010813)Narrative reason directed:IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIALCharacterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600803

Original file (MD0600803.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20050506 by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. ” The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601150

Original file (MD0601150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [Bad Conduct Discharge] Record of Trial Complete: Date Charge(s) Preferred: 19930225 Date Charges Referred to Special Court-Martial:19930308Trial Date: 19930416Applicant requested Bad Conduct Discharge:Date Applicant to Pre-trial Confinement: 19930330 Date Applicant from Pre-trial Confinement: 19930416 Date Applicant to Confinement:19930524Date Applicant from Confinement: 19930607Date Applicant to Voluntary Appellate Leave:19930616Date Applicant to Involuntary...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600999

Original file (MD0600999.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD PROCEDUREDate Notified:20011023Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCTdue to Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20011023Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Board Date: not applicable Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): UNDER...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000328

Original file (ND1000328.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601077

Similar Decisions