Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600532
Original file (MD0600532.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00532

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060302 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 2007010 3 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain General (Under Honorable Conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.






PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Issues
The Applicant submitted no decisional issues for consideration.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
 Certificate of Commendation, dtd January 27, 1997
Letter from Applicant ’s father , undated
 Meritorious Mast Certificate, dtd April 25, 1996

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19950310 - 19950424       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19950425              Date of Discharge: 19961220

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 0 1 0 7 26
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 20

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 50

Highest Rank: PFC                                    MOS: 1141

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4 . 3 ( 5 )                       Conduct: 4 .0 ( 5 )

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal, Rifle Sharpshooter Badge


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950309 :  Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
950922:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Dereliction of duty, disobeying a lawful order, and leaving weapon unattended. SNM was caught sleeping on guard duty while assigned to an armed post. SNM left his weapon unattended and it was confiscated by SOG/COG), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 960307:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation of the UCMJ, Art 86, specifically, on 960223 failed to go to the safety lecture which resulted in termination from the rifle range), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.
960617 :  NAVDRUGLAB, JACKSONVILLE, FL , reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 960603 , tested positive for THC .
960619 :  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a : In or around the month of May 1996, did knowingly and wrongfully use THC .
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 437. 00 pay per month for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 1 . Not appealed.
960624:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (illegal drug involvement, specifically my usage of marijuana), advised that processing for administrative separation is mandatory.
9 6 0702:  Director, Substance Abuse Counseling Center, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point , screened Applicant and determined he did not to meet DSM-IV criteria for cannabis/alcohol abuse or dependence.
960729 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation is in-service substance abuse namely, THC, as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB, JAXFL, msg 171702Z Jun 96 and page 12 of service record book. Applicant informed the least favorable character of service possible was as under other than honorable conditions.

960729 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
960821 :  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse and, by a vote of 2 to 1 , recommended separation with a characterization of under honorable conditions (general).

961029 :  Commanding Officer concurred with the Administrative Discharge Board and recommended that Applicant’s be discharge d with a general under honorable conditions character of service by r eason of misconduct due to dru g abuse .
961204 :  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
961204 :  GCMCA, Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing , directed the Applicant's general (under honorable conditions) discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse .

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19961220 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions ) (A and B) . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable ( C and D) .

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions or general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings for dereliction of duty, sleeping on guard duty and unauthorized absence. The Applicant was subject to nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violating Article 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s violation of Article 112a of the UCMJ is considered the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any relevant post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to 30 Jan 97.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600495

    Original file (MD0600495.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Copy 4)Response to Request for Separation Documents/InformationLetter from Applicant, dated January 7, 2006 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00267

    Original file (MD00-00267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Block 24, Character of Service should read: “UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS” vice “GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS).” The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. You should read Enclosure (5) of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01180

    Original file (MD04-01180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/ under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to “re-enter armed forces.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. 961212: CG, 2MARDIV directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00450

    Original file (MD00-00450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00450 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Board finds no reason to upgrade his discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600870

    Original file (MD0600870.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to: Secretary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00661

    Original file (MD04-00661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600326

    Original file (MD0600326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Lance Corporal J_ disobeyed the Marine Corps orders and policy regarding the illegal use of a controlled substance. When questioned about his drug use, Lance Corporal J_ denied it and has demonstrated no remorse or acknowledgement of responsibility for his actions.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501532

    Original file (MD0501532.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Two pages from Applicant’s service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19980630 - 19980809 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19980810 Date of Discharge: 20020522 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500668

    Original file (MD0500668.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :980805: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.000524: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 000519, tested positive for THC.000531: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:Specification: Wrongful use, possession, etc of a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501187

    Original file (MD0501187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation The Applicant submitted the following documentation for the Board’s consideration in addition too the service and medical record:Letter from Applicant, undated Reenlistment Resume, undated DD Form 370 enlistment request for reference from B_ L. M_, dated July 25, 1998 Reference from C_ K_, undated, unsigned DD Form 370 enlistment request for reference from S_ M_, dated July 16, 1998 DD Form 370 enlistment request for reference from G_ B_, dated September 01, 1998 Character...