Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600286
Original file (MD0600286.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00286

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 200 5 112 2 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to uncharacterized . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20061019 . After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application to the Board:
“ I was separated at an Entry Level Status while at SPTBN, MCRD, PISC RUC 32092 .”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    20010808 - 20011125       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20011126              Date of Discharge: 20020920

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 00 0 9 25 (does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 240 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 74

Highest Rank: Pvt                                   MOS: 9900

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: NA*                                    Conduct: NA*
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): None

*Not Available


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

011221:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0731 on 011221.
020122 :  Report of Declaration of Deserter. Applicant declared a deserter on 020120 having been an unauthorized absentee since 0731, 011221 from OIC, RAC, SPTBN, RTN, Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC.
020818 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1000 on 020818.

undated:         N otification and acknowledgment of separation proceedings was provided to applicant but the reason for separation was not identified.
020820:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel , elected the right to obtain co pies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. Applicant also acknowledges that this will be an Entry Level Separation.

020821:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant surrendered to military authorities on 020818 (1000) at H&S BN, MCRD, PISC.

undated:         Administrative Remarks: Applicant acknowledge d she was being separated by reason of separation in lieu of trial.

020829:  Applicant requested separation in lieu of trial. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter of 020906.]

 020906:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
020906:  Commanding General, Marine Corps Recruit Deport/Eastern Recruiting Region, Parris Island, South Carolina, approved the Applicant’s request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, but disapproved her request for a character of service of general (under honorable conditions) and directed her discharged under other than honorable conditions.

Service Record Book contains a partial Adm inistrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20020920 in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board fou nd that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).
The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. In the Applicant’s case, in the absence of a complete discharge package and without credible and substantial evidence to refute the Board’s presumption, the Board invoked the presumption of regularity. Specifically, the Board presumed that the Applicant requested discharge to escape trial by court-martial; that the Applicant had the elements of the offense for which she was charged fully explained by counsel; that the Applicant admitted guilt to the offense; and that the Applicant had a complete understanding of the negative consequences of her actions.

The Applicant implies that her discharge is improper and that her characterization should be uncharacterized because she was in an “Entry Level Status.” By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. The Applicant requested separation in lieu of trial on 20020829, 276 days after her entry into active duty. Therefore, the Board determined that the Applicant was not in an entry level status. However, even if the Applicant had been eligible for an entry level separation, the Applicant requested separation to escape trial by court-martial. Relief is not warranted.

An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by a 240-day unauthorized absence. The Applicant’s unauthorized absence is considered the commission of a serious offense, punishable by punitive discharge if awarded as part of the sentence upon conviction at special or general court martial. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for her conduct or that she should not be held accountable for her actions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her willful failure to meet the requirements of her contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of her characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
01 September 2001 until Present.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502 , Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00514

    Original file (MD01-00514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant (2pgs) Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01265

    Original file (MD03-01265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01265 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030722. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20020920 with an uncharacterized (entry level separation) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry (A). The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during her less than two months in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500550

    Original file (MD0500550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Not appealed.040310: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.040414: Applicant advised of rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.040420: Commanding Officer, H&S...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00644

    Original file (MD03-00644.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00644 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030227. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I was 18 years old at the time of enlistment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00922

    Original file (MD04-00922.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600759

    Original file (MD0600759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010131 - 20010225 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501181

    Original file (MD0501181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 980403: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region, directed the Applicant's discharge with an Entry Level Separation by reason of defective enlistment due to fraudulent entry. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601161

    Original file (MD0601161.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: PROPER Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLEIssues 1-2: The Board determined that these Issues are not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. NONE Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600069

    Original file (MD0600069.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00069 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051004. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1) Orthopedic Status Report, dtd October 22, 1999 Applicant’s State of Texas – Academic Achievement Record Applicant’s Employment activities Character Reference ltr from L_ P. S_ (Applicant’s mother), undated (7 pages) PART II - SUMMARY...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00200

    Original file (MD01-00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00200 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Relief is not warranted.The Board found the applicant’s “Letter of Request for Reduction in Rank to E-3” a non decisional issue.